Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29016245›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse2018

Effect of a high dosage opioid prior authorization policy on prescription opioid use, misuse, and overdose outcomes.

Daniel M Hartung, Hyunjee Kim, Sharia M Ahmed, Luke Middleton, Shellie Keast, Richard A Deyo, Kun Zhang, K John McConnell

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Impact of drug utilization management policy on prescription opioid use in Georgia Medicaid.Journal of pharmaceutical health services research : an official journal of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniel M Hartunga Oregon State University/Oregon Health & Science University , Portland , Oregon , USA.
Hyunjee Kimb Oregon Health & Science University , Portland , Oregon , USA.
Sharia M Ahmeda Oregon State University/Oregon Health & Science University , Portland , Oregon , USA.
Luke Middletona Oregon State University/Oregon Health & Science University , Portland , Oregon , USA.
Shellie Keastc University of Oklahoma College of Pharmacy , Oklahoma City , Oklahoma , USA.
Richard A Deyob Oregon Health & Science University , Portland , Oregon , USA.
Kun Zhangd National Center for Injury Prevention and Control , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta , Georgia , USA.
K John McConnellb Oregon Health & Science University , Portland , Oregon , USA.

Funding

NCIPC CDC HHS U01 CE002500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh dosage opioid use is a risk factor for opioid-related overdose commonly cited in guidelines, recommendations, and policies. In 2012, the Oregon Medicaid program developed a prior authorization policy for opioid prescriptions above 120 mg per day morphine equivalent dose (MED). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of that policy on utilization, prescribing patterns, and health outcomes.

methodsUsing administrative claims data from Oregon and a control state (Colorado) between 2011 and 2013, we used difference-in-differences analyses to examine changes in utilization, measures of high risk opioid use, and overdose after introduction of the policy. We also evaluated opioid utilization in a cohort of individuals who were high dosage opioid users before the policy.

resultsFollowing implementation of Oregon's high dosage policy, the monthly probability of an opioid fill over 120 mg MED declined significantly by 1.7 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI]; -2.0% to -1.4%), whereas it increased significantly by 1.0 percentage points (95% CI 0.4% to 1.7%) for opioid fills < 61 mg MED. Fills of medications used to treat neuropathic pain also increased by 1.2 percentage points (95% CI 0.7% to 1.8%). The monthly probability of multiple pharmacy use declined by 0.1 percentage points (-0.2% to -0.0) following the prior authorization, but there were no significant changes in ED encounters or hospitalizations for opioid overdose. Among individuals who were using a high dosage opioid before the policy, there was a 20.3 percentage point (95% CI -15.3% to -25.3%) decline in estimated probability of having a high dosage fill after the policy.

conclusionsOregon's prior authorization policy was effective at reducing high dosage opioid prescriptions. While multiple pharmacy use also declined, we found no impact on opioid overdose were observed.

Indexed as

Prior AuthorizationAdultAnalgesics, OpioidColoradoDrug OverdoseDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansMaleOregonPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prescription Drug MisuseYoung AdultAnalgesics, OpioidMedicaidOpioidoverdoseprior authorization

Identifiers

PMID29016245
PMCPMC9926935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.