Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28994727›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2017

Biosensing Using Magnetic Particle Detection Techniques.

Yi-Ting Chen, Arati G Kolhatkar, Oussama Zenasni, Shoujun Xu, T Randall Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Three-Dimensional Heterogeneous Bonding for High-Density and Low-Noise TMR Sensing Arrays.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Concentrated Polymer Brush-Modified Magnetic Particles for a Diagnostic Immunoassay.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The effect of FeDaru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Fine-Tuning the Superparamagnetic Properties of FeO@FeACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Magnetic Modulation of Biochemical Synthesis in Synthetic Cells.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yi-Ting ChenDepartment of Chemistry and the Texas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA. ychen75@uh.edu.
Arati G KolhatkarDepartment of Chemistry and the Texas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA. kolhatkara@yahoo.com.
Oussama ZenasniDepartment of Chemistry and the Texas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA. Zenasni_sam@hotmail.com.
Shoujun XuDepartment of Chemistry and the Texas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA. sxu7@central.uh.edu.
T Randall LeeDepartment of Chemistry and the Texas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA. trlee@uh.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic particles are widely used as signal labels in a variety of biological sensing applications, such as molecular detection and related strategies that rely on ligand-receptor binding. In this review, we explore the fundamental concepts involved in designing magnetic particles for biosensing applications and the techniques used to detect them. First, we briefly describe the magnetic properties that are important for bio-sensing applications and highlight the associated key parameters (such as the starting materials, size, functionalization methods, and bio-conjugation strategies). Subsequently, we focus on magnetic sensing applications that utilize several types of magnetic detection techniques: spintronic sensors, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) sensors, superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs), sensors based on the atomic magnetometer (AM), and others. From the studies reported, we note that the size of the MPs is one of the most important factors in choosing a sensing technique.

Indexed as

atomic magnetometerGMRmagnetic particlesmolecular sensingNMRspintronic sensorsSQUID

Identifiers

PMID28994727
PMCPMC5676660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.