Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28994452›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2018

Comparison of the Guidelines of the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium and the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group.

P C D Bank, K E Caudle, J J Swen, R S Gammal, M Whirl-Carrillo, T E Klein, M V Relling, H-J Guchelaar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 133 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
133citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

133 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. CYP2D6 Phenotype and Breast Cancer Outcomes: A Bias Analysis and Meta-Analysis.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Guideline
  9. Pooled it
  10. Guideline
  11. Guideline
  12. Guideline
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Review
  20. Review

73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

P C D BankDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
K E CaudleDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
J J SwenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
R S GammalDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
M Whirl-CarrilloPharmacogenomics Knowledgebase (PharmGKB), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
T E KleinPharmacogenomics Knowledgebase (PharmGKB), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
M V RellingDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
H-J GuchelaarDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

PharmGKB: pharmacogenomics knowledge for precision medicineR24GM061374 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALTMAN, RUSS BIAGIO, KLEIN, TERI ELLEN · 2010 to 2018
$25.2M
Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC)R24GM115264 · NIGMS · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI KLEIN, TERI ELLEN, RELLING, MARY V · 2015 to 2017
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM061374NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM115264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) and Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group provide therapeutic recommendations for well-known gene-drug pairs. Published recommendations show a high rate of concordance. However, as a result of different guideline development methods used by these two consortia, differences between the published guidelines exist. The aim of this paper is to compare both initiatives and explore these differences, with the objective to achieve harmonization.

Indexed as

PharmacogeneticsPractice Guidelines as TopicPrecision MedicineGenetic TestingHumansNetherlandsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Translational Research, BiomedicalUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28994452
PMCPMC5723247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.