Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28994322›Full record

ArticleHERD2018

Viewpoints of Parents and Nurses on How to Design Products to Enhance Parent-Infant Bonding at Neonatal Intensive Care Units: A Qualitative Study Based on Existing Designs.

Laura Schrauwen, Deedee R Kommers, Sidarto Bambang Oetomo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HERD, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura Schrauwen1 Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Deedee R Kommers2 Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
Sidarto Bambang Oetomo2 Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate how product design can be used to improve parent-infant bonding in a neonatal intensive care unit.

backgroundImpaired parent-infant bonding is an inevitable consequence of premature birth, which negatively influences development. Products, systems, or services that support the bonding process might counter these negative influences.

methodThe first step was to trace existing products by performing a literature search in PubMed, the university library, and Google. The identified existing designs were then used in semistructured interviews with nurses and parents to get insights into their desires and recommendations for product design to enhance bonding. Interviews contained open questions and a multiple-choice questionnaire based on the literature search.

resultsIn total, 17 existing design types were used in interviews with 11 parents and 23 nurses. All nurses explicitly stated that practicality was the first criterion designs aimed at enhancing bonding definitely had to meet. All parents indicated that they would like to use a design to enhance bonding if that would contribute to their child's health and development. For both parents and nurses, the most valuable way to enhance bonding seemed to be products to improve Kangaroo care; however, their specific desires varied substantially. Therefore, seven recurring themes were defined, resulting in nine general recommendations and six opportunities intended to enhance parent-infant bonding.

conclusionThis study provides design recommendations and opportunities based on parents' and nurses' expert opinions. Designing to enhance bonding is considered valuable; however, designs should match the stakeholders' desires and conditions.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansInfant CareInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntensive Care, NeonatalKangaroo-Mother Care MethodMaleNurses, PediatricParent-Child RelationsParentsQualitative ResearchdesignNICUparent–infant bondingpreterm infanttechnology

Identifiers

PMID28994322
PMCPMC5985569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.