Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28993897›Full record

ReviewJournal of digital imaging2018

Quantitative Image Feature Engine (QIFE): an Open-Source, Modular Engine for 3D Quantitative Feature Extraction from Volumetric Medical Images.

Sebastian Echegaray, Shaimaa Bakr, Daniel L Rubin, Sandy Napel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of digital imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sebastian EchegarayDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. sechegaray@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9150-4412
Shaimaa BakrDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, 650 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Daniel L RubinDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Sandy NapelDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.

Funding

Informatics Tools for Optimized Imaging Biomarkers for Cancer Research&DiscoveryU24CA180927 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KALPATHY-CRAMER, JAYASHREE, ROSEN, BRUCE R · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
Qualification and Deployment of Imaging Biomarkers of Cancer Treatment ResponseU01CA190214 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RUBIN, DANIEL L · 2015 to 2020
$3.1M
Tools for Linking and Mining image and Genomic Data in Non-Small Cell Lung CancerR01CA160251 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NAPEL, SANDY A., PLEVRITIS, SYLVIA KATINA · 2011 to 2015
$2.9M
Computing, Optimizing, and Evaluating Quantitative Cancer Imaging BiomarkersU01CA187947 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NAPEL, SANDY A., RUBIN, DANIEL L · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
Computerized Quantitative Imaging Assessment of Tumor BurdenU01CA142555 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RUBIN, DANIEL L · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160251NCI NIH HHS U01 CA142555NCI NIH HHS U01 CA187947NCI NIH HHS U01 CA190214NCI NIH HHS U24 CA180927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop an open-source, modular, locally run or server-based system for 3D radiomics feature computation that can be used on any computer system and included in existing workflows for understanding associations and building predictive models between image features and clinical data, such as survival. The QIFE exploits various levels of parallelization for use on multiprocessor systems. It consists of a managing framework and four stages: input, pre-processing, feature computation, and output. Each stage contains one or more swappable components, allowing run-time customization. We benchmarked the engine using various levels of parallelization on a cohort of CT scans presenting 108 lung tumors. Two versions of the QIFE have been released: (1) the open-source MATLAB code posted to Github, (2) a compiled version loaded in a Docker container, posted to DockerHub, which can be easily deployed on any computer. The QIFE processed 108 objects (tumors) in 2:12 (h/mm) using 1 core, and 1:04 (h/mm) hours using four cores with object-level parallelization. We developed the Quantitative Image Feature Engine (QIFE), an open-source feature-extraction framework that focuses on modularity, standards, parallelism, provenance, and integration. Researchers can easily integrate it with their existing segmentation and imaging workflows by creating input and output components that implement their existing interfaces. Computational efficiency can be improved by parallelizing execution at the cost of memory usage. Different parallelization levels provide different trade-offs, and the optimal setting will depend on the size and composition of the dataset to be processed.

Indexed as

Diffusion of InnovationImaging, Three-DimensionalRadiology, InterventionalEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPositron-Emission TomographyQuality ControlTomography, X-Ray Computed3D Image featuresFeature extractionQuantitative imagingRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID28993897
PMCPMC6113159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.