Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28993888›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2018

Oncologists' responses to patient and caregiver negative emotions and patient perception of quality of communication: results from a multi-ethnic Asian setting.

Chetna Malhotra, Ravindran Kanesvaran, Lalit Krishna, Ling Xiang, Nesaretnam Barr Kumarakulasinghe, Sing-Huang Tan, James A Tulsky, Kathryn I Pollak

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Barriers to seeking psychosocial support among adult patients with hematologic neoplasms: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Chetna MalhotraLien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore. chetna.malhotra@duke-nus.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5380-0525
Ravindran KanesvaranNational Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Lalit KrishnaNational Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Ling XiangLien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
Nesaretnam Barr KumarakulasingheNational University Cancer Institute Singapore (NCIS), National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Sing-Huang TanOncoCare Cancer Centre, Gleneagles Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
James A TulskyDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Kathryn I PollakCancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke-NUS Medical School · SGBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDuke University · USGleneagles Hospital · SGNational Cancer Centre Singapore · SGNational University Cancer Institute, Singapore · SGNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

Lien Centre for Palliative Care LCPC-IN14-002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with advanced cancer and their caregivers experience many negative emotions. Empathic responses from oncologists can help alleviate their distress. We aimed to assess expressions of negative emotions among patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers and oncologists' empathic responses during consultations in an Asian setting. We also assessed the association between oncologists' expression of empathy and patients' and caregivers' perception of communication quality.

methodsWe surveyed 100 patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers and audio recorded consultations with their oncologists. We coded expressions of negative emotions by patients and caregivers and oncologists' empathic responses. We also surveyed participating oncologists (n = 30) about their confidence in expressing empathy and perceived communication behavior outcomes.

resultsAbout 52% of patients and 49% of caregivers expressed at least one negative emotion during the consultation, though 59% of patients and 48% of caregivers reported not wanting to discuss negative emotions. Oncologists responded empathically to 12% of patients' negative emotions and 9% of caregivers' negative emotions, despite 92% of them reporting confidence in expressing empathy. Oncologists' expression of empathy did not vary significantly by patient, caregiver, or their own demographic characteristics. It also did not differ based on their confidence in expressing empathy and positive outcome expectations. When oncologists responded empathically just one time, patients perceived communication more favorably.

conclusionsIn this Asian setting, patients and caregivers commonly expressed negative emotions. Oncologists' expressed empathy infrequently, although when they were empathic, it was related to improved patient perception of communication quality.

Indexed as

CommunicationAsian PeopleCaregiversEmotionsEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOncologistsPerceptionSurveys and QuestionnairesCancerCaregiverCommunicationEmpathyNegative emotionOncology

Identifiers

PMID28993888
OpenAlexW2763323315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.