Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28993864›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2018

Frequency sensitivity in Northern saw-whet owls (Aegolius acadicus).

Julia R Beatini, Glenn A Proudfoot, Megan D Gall

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Can you hear me? House sparrow auditory processing differs across an urbanization gradient.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2022
    Article
  5. Evolution and Ecology of Silent Flight in Owls and Other Flying Vertebrates.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2020
    Review
  6. Auditory performance in bald eagles and red-tailed hawks: a comparative study of hearing in diurnal raptors.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2019
    Article
  7. The paradox of hearing at the lek: auditory sensitivity increases after breeding in female gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis).Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia R BeatiniBiology Department, Vassar College, 124 Raymond Ave, Poughkeepsie, NY, 12604, USA.
Glenn A ProudfootBiology Department, Vassar College, 124 Raymond Ave, Poughkeepsie, NY, 12604, USA.
Megan D GallBiology Department, Vassar College, 124 Raymond Ave, Poughkeepsie, NY, 12604, USA. megall@vassar.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Northern saw-whet owls (Aegolius acadicus) are known for their unique asymmetrical ear structure and ability to localize prey acoustically, yet few attempts have been made to explore the auditory capabilities of this species. In this study, we evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) with tonebursts to assess three main hypotheses regarding the evolution of auditory sensitivity: sender-receiver matching, ecological constraints, and phylogenetic/morphological constraints. We found that ABR amplitude increased with increasing stimulus level, which is consistent with results in other avian species. ABR amplitudes, latencies, and thresholds indicate that the hearing range of Northern saw-whet owls extends from 0.7 to 8.6 kHz, with an extended frequency range of best sensitivity between 1.6 and 7.1 kHz. Sensitivity fell off rapidly above and below these frequencies. The average audiogram was structurally similar to those found in other species of owls, suggesting that phylogeny or morphology may be constraining the frequency range of auditory sensitivity. However, ABR thresholds were 10-25 dB lower than those of Eastern screech-owls (Megascops asio), with thresholds below 0 dB SPL in some individuals. The lowest thresholds were at frequencies not found in the vocalizations of Northern saw-whet owls, suggesting ecological constraints rather than conspecific vocalizations are driving absolute sensitivity.

Indexed as

HearingStrigiformesAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory ThresholdEarEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFemaleMaleSkullSound SpectrographySpecies SpecificityVocalization, AnimalCommunicationHearingNorthern saw-whet owlPeripheral auditory processing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.