Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28993833›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2018

Do anti-stroma therapies improve extrinsic resistance to increase the efficacy of gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer?

Chen Liang, Si Shi, Qingcai Meng, Dingkong Liang, Shunrong Ji, Bo Zhang, Yi Qin, Jin Xu, Quanxing Ni, Xianjun Yu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chen LiangDepartment of Pancreatic and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Si ShiDepartment of Pancreatic and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Qingcai MengDepartment of Pancreatic and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Dingkong LiangDepartment of Pancreatic and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Shunrong JiDepartment of Pancreatic and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Bo ZhangDepartment of Pancreatic and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Yi QinDepartment of Pancreatic and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Jin XuDepartment of Pancreatic and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Quanxing NiDepartment of Pancreatic and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Xianjun YuDepartment of Pancreatic and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China. yuxianjun@fudanpci.org.ORCID 0000-0002-6697-7143
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81372651National Natural Science Foundation of China 81502031National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China 81625016Shanghai Sailing Program 17YF1402500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is among the most devastating human malignancies, with approximately 20-30% of PDAC patients receiving the surgical resection with curative intent. Although many studies have focused on finding ideal "drug chaperones" that facilitate and/or potentiate the effects of gemcitabine (GEM) in pancreatic cancer, a significant benefit in overall survival could not be demonstrated for any of these combination therapies in PDAC. Given that pancreatic cancer is characterized by desmoplasia and the dual biological roles of stroma in pancreatic cancer, we reassess the importance of stroma in GEM-based therapeutic approaches in light of current findings. This review is focused on understanding the role of stromal components in the extrinsic resistance to GEM and whether anti-stroma therapies have a positive effect on the GEM delivery. This work contributes to the development of novel and promising combination GEM-based regimens that have achieved significant survival benefits for the patients with pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAlbuminsAnilidesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDeoxycytidineDrug Resistance, NeoplasmDrug SynergismGemcitabineHumansHyaluronic AcidOsteonectinPaclitaxelPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsPyridines130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxelAlbuminsAnilidesDeoxycytidineGemcitabineHhAntag691Hyaluronic AcidOsteonectinPaclitaxelPyridinesSPARC protein, humanDrug deliveryGemcitabineHyaluronanNab-paclitaxelPancreatic cancerStroma

Identifiers

PMID28993833
PMCPMC11105455
OpenAlexW2761962792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.