Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28993495›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

Sleep research goes wild: new methods and approaches to investigate the ecology, evolution and functions of sleep.

Niels C Rattenborg, Horacio O de la Iglesia, Bart Kempenaers, John A Lesku, Peter Meerlo, Madeleine F Scriba

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Assessing Sleep Architecture in Rural Eastern Cape Villagers of South Africa Using ŌURA Ring Data.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Recognition of distinct sleep states inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Sleep Patterns and Human Brain Health.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Diurnal and Nocturnal Behaviour of Cheetahs (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Niels C RattenborgAvian Sleep Group, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, 82319 Seewiesen, Germany rattenborg@orn.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1140-222X
Horacio O de la IglesiaDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1800, USA.
Bart KempenaersDepartment of Behavioral Ecology and Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, 82319 Seewiesen, Germany.
John A LeskuSchool of Life Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne 3086, Victoria, Australia.
Peter MeerloGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, 9700 Groningen, The Netherlands.
Madeleine F ScribaDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3046-5004

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite being a prominent aspect of animal life, sleep and its functions remain poorly understood. As with any biological process, the functions of sleep can only be fully understood when examined in the ecological context in which they evolved. Owing to technological constraints, until recently, sleep has primarily been examined in the artificial laboratory environment. However, new tools are enabling researchers to study sleep behaviour and neurophysiology in the wild. Here, we summarize the various methods that have enabled sleep researchers to go wild, their strengths and weaknesses, and the discoveries resulting from these first steps outside the laboratory. The initial studies to 'go wild' have revealed a wealth of interindividual variation in sleep, and shown that sleep duration is not even fixed within an individual, but instead varies in response to an assortment of ecological demands. Determining the costs and benefits of this inter- and intraindividual variation in sleep may reveal clues to the functions of sleep. Perhaps the greatest surprise from these initial studies is that the reduction in neurobehavioural performance resulting from sleep loss demonstrated in the laboratory is not an obligatory outcome of reduced sleep in the wild.This article is part of the themed issue 'Wild clocks: integrating chronobiology and ecology to understand timekeeping in free-living animals'.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, WildBiological EvolutionChronobiology DisciplineSleepbehaviourecologyevolutionfunctionhumanwild

Identifiers

PMID28993495
PMCPMC5647278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.