Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28993482›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

The Prediction of Impact of a Looming Stimulus onto the Body Is Subserved by Multisensory Integration Mechanisms.

Justine Cléry, Olivier Guipponi, Soline Odouard, Serge Pinède, Claire Wardak, Suliann Ben Hamed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Peripersonal space: why so last-second?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Interdigitated Columnar Representation of Personal Space and Visual Space in Human Parietal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Justine CléryInstitut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS-Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, 69675 Bron, France.
Olivier GuipponiInstitut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS-Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, 69675 Bron, France.
Soline OdouardInstitut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS-Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, 69675 Bron, France.
Serge PinèdeInstitut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS-Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, 69675 Bron, France.
Claire WardakInstitut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS-Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, 69675 Bron, France.
Suliann Ben HamedInstitut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS-Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, 69675 Bron, France benhamed@isc.cnrs.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-1510-7284

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the jungle, survival is highly correlated with the ability to detect and distinguish between an approaching predator and a putative prey. From an ecological perspective, a predator rapidly approaching its prey is a stronger cue for flight than a slowly moving predator. In the present study, we use functional magnetic resonance imaging in the nonhuman primate, to investigate the neural bases of the prediction of an impact to the body by a looming stimulus, i.e., the neural bases of the interaction between a dynamic visual stimulus approaching the body and its expected consequences onto an independent sensory modality, namely, touch. We identify a core cortical network of occipital, parietal, premotor, and prefrontal areas maximally activated by tactile stimulations presented at the predicted time and location of impact of the looming stimulus on the faces compared with the activations observed for spatially or temporally incongruent tactile and dynamic visual cues. These activations reflect both an active integration of visual and tactile information and of spatial and temporal prediction information. The identified cortical network coincides with a well described multisensory visuotactile convergence and integration network suggested to play a key role in the definition of peripersonal space. These observations are discussed in the context of multisensory integration and spatial, temporal prediction and Bayesian causal inference.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnticipation, PsychologicalEye MovementsFemaleForecastingMacaca mulattaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationPhysical StimulationReaction TimeTouchVisual PerceptionfMRIlooming visualmacaquemultisensory integrationpredictiontactile

Identifiers

PMID28993482
PMCPMC6596520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.