Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28993332›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2017

Amikacin Pharmacokinetics To Optimize Dosing in Neonates with Perinatal Asphyxia Treated with Hypothermia.

Sinziana Cristea, Anne Smits, Aida Kulo, Catherijne A J Knibbe, Mirjam van Weissenbruch, Elke H J Krekels, Karel Allegaert

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Use of Antibiotics in Preterm Newborns.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Sinziana CristeaDivision of Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre of Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Anne SmitsNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Aida KuloInstitute of Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical Faculty, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Catherijne A J KnibbeDivision of Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre of Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Mirjam van WeissenbruchNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Elke H J KrekelsDivision of Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre of Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Karel AllegaertIntensive Care, Department of Pediatric Surgery, and Department of Neonatology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands karel.allegaert@uzleuven.be.
Leiden University · NLUniversity of Sarajevo · BAAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLErasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics (PK) is expected to change in neonates with perinatal asphyxia treated with therapeutic hypothermia (PATH). Several amikacin dosing guidelines have been proposed for treating neonates with (suspected) septicemia; however, none provide adjustments for cases of PATH. Therefore, we aimed to quantify the differences in amikacin PK between neonates with and without PATH to propose suitable dosing recommendations. Based on amikacin therapeutic drug monitoring data collected retrospectively from neonates with PATH, combined with a published data set, we assessed the impact of PATH on amikacin PK by using population modeling. Monte Carlo and stochastic simulations were performed to establish amikacin exposures in neonates with PATH after dosing according to the current guidelines and according to proposed model-derived dosing guidelines. Amikacin clearance was decreased 40.6% in neonates with PATH, with no changes in volume of distribution. Simulations showed that increasing the dosing interval by 12 h results in a decrease in the percentage of neonates reaching toxic trough levels (>5 mg/liter), from 40 to 76% to 14 to 25%, while still reaching efficacy targets compared to the results of current dosing regimens. Based on this study, a 12-h increase in the amikacin dosing interval in neonates with PATH is proposed to correct for the reduced clearance, yielding safe and effective exposures. As amikacin is renally excreted, further studies into other renally excreted drugs may be required, as their clearance may also be impaired.

Indexed as

AmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAsphyxiaDrug Administration ScheduleDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansHypothermia, InducedInfant, NewbornMonte Carlo MethodObstetric Labor ComplicationsParturitionPregnancySepsisAmikacinAnti-Bacterial Agentsamikacindose optimizationhypothermiamodel-informed dosingneonatesperinatal asphyxia

Identifiers

PMID28993332
PMCPMC5700363
OpenAlexW2763911322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.