Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28993232›Full record

ReviewNeuroImage2019

MR elastography of the brain and its application in neurological diseases.

Matthew C Murphy, John Huston, Richard L Ehman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 188 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Measuring Brain Stiffness in Normal Adults According to Age and Sex Using Virtual MR Elastography: A Preliminary Study.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew C MurphyDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States. Electronic address: murphy.matthew@mayo.edu.
John HustonDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Richard L EhmanDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Magnetic Resonance ElastographyR37EB001981 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI EHMAN, RICHARD L. · 2016 to 2025
$4.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS R37 EB001981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is an imaging technique for noninvasively and quantitatively assessing tissue stiffness, akin to palpation. MRE is further able assess the mechanical properties of tissues that cannot be reached by hand including the brain. The technique is a three-step process beginning with the introduction of shear waves into the tissue of interest by applying an external vibration. Next, the resulting motion is imaged using a phase-contrast MR pulse sequence with motion encoding gradients that are synchronized to the vibration. Finally, the measured displacement images are mathematically inverted to compute a map of the estimated stiffness. In the brain, the technique has demonstrated strong test-retest repeatability with typical errors of 1% for measuring global stiffness, 2% for measuring stiffness in the lobes of the brain, and 3-7% for measuring stiffness in subcortical gray matter. In healthy volunteers, multiple studies have confirmed that stiffness decreases with age, while more recent studies have demonstrated a strong relationship between viscoelasticity and behavioral performance. Furthermore, several studies have demonstrated the sensitivity of brain stiffness to neurodegeneration, as stiffness has been shown to decrease in multiple sclerosis and in several forms of dementia. Moreover, the spatial pattern of stiffness changes varies among these different classes of dementia. Finally, MRE is a promising tool for the preoperative assessment of intracranial tumors, as it can measure both tumor consistency and adherence to surrounding tissues. These factors are important predictors of surgical difficulty. In brief, MRE demonstrates potential value in a number of neurological diseases. However, significant opportunity remains to further refine the technique and better understand the underlying physiology.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainBrain NeoplasmsDementiaDemyelinating DiseasesElasticity Imaging TechniquesHumansImage Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID28993232
PMCPMC5889749
OpenAlexW2761842805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.