Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28993042›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of physical therapy

Effect of sacroiliac manipulation on postural sway in quiet standing: a randomized controlled trial.

Mohammad Reza Farazdaghi, Alireza Motealleh, Forough Abtahi, Andrej Panjan, Nejc Šarabon, Farahnaz Ghaffarinejad

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of physical therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04387032 (The Influence of the Sacroiliac Joint Manipulation on Changes in the Values of the Center of Pressure in the Process of Maintaining Static Body Balance), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04387032 nacompletednot on this map

The Influence of the Sacroiliac Joint Manipulation on Changes in the Values of the Center of Pressure in the Process of Maintaining Static Body Balance

TypeinterventionalSponsorPoznan University of Physical EducationRan2019 to 2019Enrolled59ConditionsAsymptomatic Condition, Sacroiliac DisorderArmsHVLA Manipulations, Sham Manipulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Chiropractic manipulation techniques and nuances.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammad Reza FarazdaghiShiraz University of Medical Sciences, Rehabilitation Faculty, Shiraz, Iran; Rehabilitation Sciences Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Alireza MoteallehShiraz University of Medical Sciences, Rehabilitation Faculty, Shiraz, Iran; Rehabilitation Sciences Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. Electronic address: motealleh@sums.ac.ir.
Forough AbtahiShiraz University of Medical Sciences, Rehabilitation Faculty, Shiraz, Iran; Rehabilitation Sciences Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Andrej PanjanAndrej Marusic Institute, Department of Health Study, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia.
Nejc ŠarabonAndrej Marusic Institute, Department of Health Study, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia; S2P Ltd., Laboratory for Motor Control and Motor Behavior, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Farahnaz GhaffarinejadShiraz University of Medical Sciences, Rehabilitation Faculty, Shiraz, Iran; Rehabilitation Sciences Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Primorska · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSacroiliac joint manipulation can alter joint and muscle control mechanisms through local and remote effects. Postural balance is controlled by supraspinal (rambling) and spinal-peripheral (trembling) mechanisms. A manipulation may interfere with postural control in quiet standing.

objectivesTo evaluate the immediate effects of sacroiliac joint manipulation on postural control in patients with (1) sacroiliac dysfunction and (2) to determine whether rambling and trembling are affected by sacroiliac joint manipulation.

methods32 patients aged between 20 and 50 years old were selected by convenience after confirmation of sacroiliac joint dysfunction by clinical examination. These patients were randomly allocated either to manipulation or sham manipulation group. Displacement, velocity and frequency of the center of pressure, rambling and trembling in the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral directions were our primary outcomes and analyzed immediately before and after the intervention in quiet standing. The physical therapists who performed the physical, biomechanical and statistical examinations, were all blinded to the patients' grouping.

resultsNo differences were found between the two groups but trembling velocity (0.14 and -0.11 for intervention and sham group, respectively) and frequency (0.17 and 0.11 for intervention and sham group respectively) increased after intervention in the treatment group in the anterior-posterior direction.

conclusionGenerally, sacroiliac joint manipulation had no superiority than sham treatment regarding postural control as measured by rambling-trembling analysis of center of pressure. Manipulation may increase muscle activation in the treatment group due to increased trembling parameters. Trial number: IRCT2014072715932N8 - http://www.irct.ir/searchresult.php?keyword=%D8%B3%D9%88%DB%8C%D9%87&id=15932&field=&number=8&prt=13&total=10&m=1.

Indexed as

HumansPostural BalancePosturePressureManipulationPostural swayRamblingSacroiliac joint dysfunctionTrembling

Identifiers

PMID28993042
PMCPMC5883953
OpenAlexW2751816242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.