ArticleCochlear implants international2018
Sensitivity of expressive linguistic domains to surgery age and audibility of speech in preschoolers with cochlear implants.
Article in Cochlear implants international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Urdu-English Perceptual Confusions in Bilingual Children with Normal Hearing and Cochlear Implants: An Analysis of Place, Manner, and Voicing Features.Audiology research · 2026Article
- Article
- Parental Evaluation of a Responsive Parenting Program for Infants with Hearing Loss.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Spoken Sentence Complexity and Grammar Use in Children with CIs.Journal of deaf studies and deaf education · 2023Article
- Oral Language Acquisition in Preschool Children Who are Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing.Journal of deaf studies and deaf education · 2022Article
- [Impact of CI use and CI fitting on speech production in very early cochlear-implanted infants].HNO · 2021Article
- The Impact of Cumulative Cochlear Implant Wear Time on Spoken Language Outcomes at Age 3 Years.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021Article
- Effect of grammar intervention on vocabulary skills in children with a cochlear implant: A single-subject study.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2021Article
- Rethinking Emergent Literacy in Children With Hearing Loss.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Review
- Morphosyntax Production of Preschool Children With Hearing Loss: An Evaluation of the Extended Optional Infinitive and Surface Accounts.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2018Article
- Long-Term Language Development in Children With Early Simultaneous Bilateral Cochlear Implants.Ear and hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo determine whether relative delays among domains exist in the conversational use of vocabulary, syntax, and morphology by children with cochlear implants (CIs) and whether these were differentially affected by age of implantation (AOI) and the audibility of speech.
methodsParticipants in this short-term longitudinal study were 126 children with AOI of 6-38 months and a matched group of 30 children without hearing loss. Language samples of the same children at ages 3.5 and 4.5 were analyzed for the breadth of vocabulary and bound morphemes used, and sentence length.
resultsAt both test ages, expressive language domains were delayed equally. Higher performance across domains was independently associated with younger AOI and better pre-implant-aided thresholds. No domain was affected differently by very early implantation, but bound morpheme breadth was associated with better CI-aided thresholds. Between 63 and 78% of children with AOI of 6-11 months scored close to hearing age-mates by 4.5, a level achieved by fewer than 25% of those with AOI of 19-24 months or later ages. DISCUSSION: Previous studies indicated greater language delays in the areas of morphology and syntax than those of vocabulary, with the earliest ages of implantation conferring the greatest benefit to those domains. The current design addressed inconsistency across studies in modes of communication used, presence/absence of other disabilities, and differences in language domains chosen as outcome measures.
conclusionsLinguistic domains benefitted equally from early implantation, regardless of the duration of auditory stimulation. Better pre-CI-aided hearing often compensated for later AOI. Bound morpheme use was greater with better CI-aided thresholds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.