Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28992767›Full record

ArticleCochlear implants international2018

Sensitivity of expressive linguistic domains to surgery age and audibility of speech in preschoolers with cochlear implants.

Johanna G Nicholas, Ann E Geers

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cochlear implants international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Spoken Sentence Complexity and Grammar Use in Children with CIs.Journal of deaf studies and deaf education · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Impact of Cumulative Cochlear Implant Wear Time on Spoken Language Outcomes at Age 3 Years.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Johanna G Nicholasa Department of Otolaryngology , Washington University School of Medicine , Box 8115, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis , MO 63130 , USA.
Ann E Geersb School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences , The University of Texas at Dallas , GR41, 800 West Campbell Rd., Richardson , TX 75080 , USA.
The University of Texas at Dallas · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

EFFECT OF VERY EARLY COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION ON LANGUAGER01DC004168 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI NICHOLAS, JOHANNA G · 2000 to 2011
$3.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether relative delays among domains exist in the conversational use of vocabulary, syntax, and morphology by children with cochlear implants (CIs) and whether these were differentially affected by age of implantation (AOI) and the audibility of speech.

methodsParticipants in this short-term longitudinal study were 126 children with AOI of 6-38 months and a matched group of 30 children without hearing loss. Language samples of the same children at ages 3.5 and 4.5 were analyzed for the breadth of vocabulary and bound morphemes used, and sentence length.

resultsAt both test ages, expressive language domains were delayed equally. Higher performance across domains was independently associated with younger AOI and better pre-implant-aided thresholds. No domain was affected differently by very early implantation, but bound morpheme breadth was associated with better CI-aided thresholds. Between 63 and 78% of children with AOI of 6-11 months scored close to hearing age-mates by 4.5, a level achieved by fewer than 25% of those with AOI of 19-24 months or later ages. DISCUSSION: Previous studies indicated greater language delays in the areas of morphology and syntax than those of vocabulary, with the earliest ages of implantation conferring the greatest benefit to those domains. The current design addressed inconsistency across studies in modes of communication used, presence/absence of other disabilities, and differences in language domains chosen as outcome measures.

conclusionsLinguistic domains benefitted equally from early implantation, regardless of the duration of auditory stimulation. Better pre-CI-aided hearing often compensated for later AOI. Bound morpheme use was greater with better CI-aided thresholds.

Indexed as

Age FactorsChild LanguageAcoustic StimulationCase-Control StudiesChild, PreschoolCochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsFemaleHearingHearing LossHumansInfantLanguage TestsLinguisticsLongitudinal StudiesMaleAudibilityCochlear implantDeafnessExpressive language developmentMorphologyPediatricSyntaxVocabulary

Identifiers

PMID28992767
PMCPMC6230255
OpenAlexW2763915854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.