Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28992442›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of cell and developmental biology2017

Cell Sheet Morphogenesis: Dorsal Closure in Drosophila melanogaster as a Model System.

Daniel P Kiehart, Janice M Crawford, Andreas Aristotelous, Stephanos Venakides, Glenn S Edwards

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of cell and developmental biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Collective migration modes in development, tissue repair and cancer.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A minimal vertex model explains how the amnioserosa avoids fluidization duringProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Integrative Analysis of Key Signalling Pathways in Neural Tube Defects: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  8. The Enigmas of Tissue Closure: Inspiration fromCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Finishing the egg.Genetics · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evidence that tissue recoil in the earlyMolecular biology of the cell · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. How two extraembryonic epithelia became one: serosa and amnion features and functions ofPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel P KiehartDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708; email: dkiehart@duke.edu.
Janice M CrawfordDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708; email: dkiehart@duke.edu.
Andreas AristotelousDepartment of Mathematics, West Chester University, West Chester, Pennsylvania 19383.
Stephanos VenakidesDepartment of Mathematics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708.
Glenn S EdwardsPhysics Department, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708.

Funding

Morphogenesis: Biophysics and Genetics of Dorsal ClosureR01GM033830 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI KIEHART, DANIEL PETER · 1985 to 2017
$7.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM033830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dorsal closure is a key process during Drosophila morphogenesis that models cell sheet movements in chordates, including neural tube closure, palate formation, and wound healing. Closure occurs midway through embryogenesis and entails circumferential elongation of lateral epidermal cell sheets that close a dorsal hole filled with amnioserosa cells. Signaling pathways regulate the function of cellular structures and processes, including Actomyosin and microtubule cytoskeletons, cell-cell/cell-matrix adhesion complexes, and endocytosis/vesicle trafficking. These orchestrate complex shape changes and movements that entail interactions between five distinct cell types. Genetic and laser perturbation studies establish that closure is robust, resilient, and the consequence of redundancy that contributes to four distinct biophysical processes: contraction of the amnioserosa, contraction of supracellular Actomyosin cables, elongation (stretching?) of the lateral epidermis, and zipping together of two converging cell sheets. What triggers closure and what the emergent properties are that give rise to its extraordinary resilience and fidelity remain key, extant questions.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalMorphogenesisAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaDrosophila melanogasterSignal TransductionActomyosinamnioserosabiomechanicsingressionmorphogeneticsoscillation

Identifiers

PMID28992442
PMCPMC6524656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.