Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28992326›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2018

Neurological complications of new chemotherapy agents.

Alicia M Zukas, David Schiff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Addressing the Needs of Breast Cancer Survivors.Current oncology reports · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Multiple sclerosis outcomes after cancer immunotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019
    Review
  19. Neurological complications of systemic tumor therapy.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alicia M ZukasDepartment of Neurology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
David SchiffDepartment of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This last decade has yielded more robust development of cancer treatments and first-in-class agents than ever before. Since 2006, nearly one hundred new drugs have received regulatory approval for the treatment of hematological and solid organ neoplasms. Moreover, older conventional therapies have received approval for new clinical indications and are being used in combination with these newer small-molecule targeted treatments. The nervous system is vulnerable to many of the traditional cancer therapies, manifesting both already well-described acute and chronic toxicities. However, newer agents may produce toxicities that may seem indistinguishable from the underlying cancer. Early recognition of neurotoxicities from new therapeutics is vital to avoid irreversible neurological injury. This review focuses on cancer therapies in use in the last 10 years and approved by the FDA from January 2006 through January 1, 2017.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesAntineoplastic AgentsHumansNeoplasmsNervous System DiseasesNeurotoxicity SyndromesTreatment OutcomeAntibodiesAntineoplastic Agentsantineoplastic agentscentral nervous systemneurotoxicity syndromesperipheral nervous system

Identifiers

PMID28992326
PMCPMC5761528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.