Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28992245›Full record

ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2017

A Complex Lens for a Complex Eye.

Aaron L Stahl, Regina S Baucom, Tiffany A Cook, Elke K Buschbeck

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aaron L StahlDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA.
Regina S BaucomDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Tiffany A CookWayne State University School of Medicine, Center of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Elke K BuschbeckDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA.
University of Cincinnati · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USWayne State University · US

Funding

Pros/Prox1 and Lens Development R01EY017907 · NEI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI COOK, TIFFANY · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
Defining Glial Programs that Support Adult Photoreceptor Form and FunctionR21EY024405 · NEI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI COOK, TIFFANY · 2014 to 2015
$425k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017907NEI NIH HHS R21 EY024405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key innovation for high resolution eyes is a sophisticated lens that precisely focuses light onto photoreceptors. The eyes of holometabolous larvae range from very simple eyes that merely detect light to eyes that are capable of high spatial resolution. Particularly interesting are the bifocal lenses of Thermonectus marmoratus larvae, which differentially focus light on spectrally-distinct retinas. While functional aspects of insect lenses have been relatively well studied, little work has explored their molecular makeup, especially in regard to more complex eye types. To investigate this question, we took a transcriptomic and proteomic approach to identify the major proteins contributing to the principal bifocal lenses of T. marmoratus larvae. Mass spectrometry revealed 10 major lens proteins. Six of these share sequence homology with cuticular proteins, a large class of proteins that are also major components of corneal lenses from adult compound eyes of Drosophila melanogaster and Anopheles gambiae. Two proteins were identified as house-keeping genes and the final two lack any sequence homologies to known genes. Overall the composition seems to follow a pattern of co-opting transparent and optically dense proteins, similar to what has been described for other animal lenses. To identify cells responsible for the secretion of specific lens proteins, we performed in situ hybridization studies and found some expression differences between distal and proximal corneagenous cells. Since the distal cells likely give rise to the periphery and the proximal cells to the center of the lens, our findings highlight a possible mechanism for establishing structural differences that are in line with the bifocal nature of these lenses. A better understanding of lens composition provides insights into the evolution of proper focusing, which is an important step in the transition between low-resolution and high-resolution eyes.

Indexed as

AnimalsColeopteraCompound Eye, ArthropodInsect ProteinsLarvaPhotoreceptor CellsProteomeTranscriptomeInsect ProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID28992245
PMCPMC5886344
OpenAlexW2751284541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.