Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28992173›Full record

SynthesisRheumatology (Oxford, England)2017

Assessment of skin involvement in systemic sclerosis.

Gábor Kumánovics, Márta Péntek, Sangmee Bae, Daniela Opris, Dinesh Khanna, Daniel E Furst, László Czirják

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Gábor KumánovicsDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs.
Márta PéntekDepartment of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
Sangmee BaeDepartment of Rheumatology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Daniela OprisInternal Medicine and Rheumatology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Dinesh KhannaDepartment of Medicine, University of Michigan Scleroderma Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Daniel E FurstDepartment of Rheumatology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
László CzirjákDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs.
University of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Pecs · HUCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROCorvinus University of Budapest · HUScleroderma Foundation · US

Funding

Outcomes Research in Rheumatic DiseasesK24AR063120 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KHANNA, DINESH · 2012 to 2022
$1.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR063120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin involvement in SSc is an important marker of disease activity, severity and prognosis, making the assessment of skin a key issue in SSc clinical research. We reviewed the published data assessing skin involvement in clinical trials and summarized the major conclusions important in SSc clinical research. A systematic literature review identified randomized controlled trials using skin outcomes in SSc. Analysis examined the validity of the different skin measures based on literature findings. Twenty-two randomized controlled trials were found. The average study duration was 10.2 (s.d. 4.5) months, mean (s.d.) sample size 32.4 (32.6) and 26.7 (27.8) in intervention and control arms, respectively. The 17-site modified Rodnan skin score is a fully validated primary outcome measure in diffuse cutaneous SSc. Skin histology seems to be an appropriate method for evaluation of skin thickness. These findings have important implications for clinical trial design targeting skin involvement in SSc.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementSkin DiseasesClinical Trials as TopicHumansScleroderma, SystemicOMERACT filteroutcome measuringrandomized controlled trialssclerodermaskin involvementsystemic sclerosisvalidation

Identifiers

PMID28992173
PMCPMC5850338
OpenAlexW2761152187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.