ArticleJournal of radiation research2017
Carbon-ion radiotherapy for patients with advanced stage non-small-cell lung cancer at multicenters.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Carbon-Ion radiotherapy alone for inoperable locally advanced Non-Small cell lung cancer: A Japanese National registry study (J-CROS-LUNG).Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Observational
- Multi-omics integration reveals inhibitory effects of carbon ion radiation on lung adenocarcinoma proliferation.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Effectiveness and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical indications and future directions of carbon-ion radiotherapy: a narrative review.Ewha medical journal · 2024Review
- Clinical results of proton beam radiotherapy for inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a Japanese national registry study.Journal of radiation research · 2023Article
- Research Progress of Heavy Ion Radiotherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Carbon ion radiotherapy for synchronous choroidal melanoma and lung cancer: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- Carbon-ion radiotherapy for octogenarians with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.Japanese journal of radiology · 2021Article
- Who Will Benefit from Charged-Particle Therapy?Cancer research and treatment · 2021Review
- Clinical outcomes of carbon-ion radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.Cancer science · 2019Article
- External dosimetry audit for quality assurance of carbon-ion radiation therapy clinical trials.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2019Article
- Determining RBE for development of lung fibrosis induced by fractionated irradiation with carbon ions utilizing fibrosis index and high-LET BED model.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carbon-ion radiation therapy (CIRT) for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been well studied to date. This paper aimed to analyze a retrospective multicenter survey for detecting problems with the use of CIRT for Stage II and III NSCLC (7th UICC TNM Staging System). Inclusion was restricted to patients with Stage II and III NSCLC who received CIRT from November 2003 to December 2014. We gathered the data from three CIRT operating centers on July 2015. Patients with radiotherapy history, patients with cancers other than lung cancer, and those receiving palliative therapies were excluded. The patient characteristics, prescribed dose/fraction, survival rates, and adverse effects were analyzed. The total number of patients was 64 (male: 49, female: 15). Of these, 53 patients were medically inoperable. The median age was 76 years (range 46-91), and the median follow-up period was 18.5 months (range 3.2-121.5). The clinical staging consisted of 10 Stage IIA, 30 Stage IIB, 23 Stage IIIA and 1 Stage IIIB. The median prescribed dose was 72.0 Gy (RBE) (range 52.8-72.0) in 16 fractions (range 4-16). The 2-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and local control rates were 62.2% [confidence interval (CI): 47.5-76.9], 42.3% (CI: 28.8-55.8) and 81.8% (CI: 69.9-94.0), respectively. There were no higher than Grade 2 adverse effects observed. CIRT for inoperable Stage II and III NSCLC could be implemented without severe adverse effects, but the clinical staging (including lymph node status) was inhomogeneous. In addition, the prescribed dose and fractionation were not standardized. Further data accumulation and a multiple centers prospective trial for evaluating clinical stage-based results are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.