Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28992088›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2017

Carbon-ion radiotherapy for patients with advanced stage non-small-cell lung cancer at multicenters.

Masataka Karube, Naoyoshi Yamamoto, Yoshiyuki Shioyama, Junichi Saito, Akira Matsunobu, Tamaki Okimoto, Tatsuya Ohno, Hiroshi Tsuji, Takashi Nakano, Tadashi Kamada

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Research Progress of Heavy Ion Radiotherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Who Will Benefit from Charged-Particle Therapy?Cancer research and treatment · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Masataka KarubeNational Institute of Radiological Sciences Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, 4-9-1, Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.
Naoyoshi YamamotoNational Institute of Radiological Sciences Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, 4-9-1, Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.
Yoshiyuki ShioyamaIon Beam Therapy Center, SAGA HIMAT Foundation.
Junichi SaitoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine.
Akira MatsunobuIon Beam Therapy Center, SAGA HIMAT Foundation.
Tamaki OkimotoDepartment of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center.
Tatsuya OhnoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine.
Hiroshi TsujiNational Institute of Radiological Sciences Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, 4-9-1, Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.
Takashi NakanoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine.
Tadashi KamadaNational Institute of Radiological Sciences Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, 4-9-1, Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon-ion radiation therapy (CIRT) for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been well studied to date. This paper aimed to analyze a retrospective multicenter survey for detecting problems with the use of CIRT for Stage II and III NSCLC (7th UICC TNM Staging System). Inclusion was restricted to patients with Stage II and III NSCLC who received CIRT from November 2003 to December 2014. We gathered the data from three CIRT operating centers on July 2015. Patients with radiotherapy history, patients with cancers other than lung cancer, and those receiving palliative therapies were excluded. The patient characteristics, prescribed dose/fraction, survival rates, and adverse effects were analyzed. The total number of patients was 64 (male: 49, female: 15). Of these, 53 patients were medically inoperable. The median age was 76 years (range 46-91), and the median follow-up period was 18.5 months (range 3.2-121.5). The clinical staging consisted of 10 Stage IIA, 30 Stage IIB, 23 Stage IIIA and 1 Stage IIIB. The median prescribed dose was 72.0 Gy (RBE) (range 52.8-72.0) in 16 fractions (range 4-16). The 2-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and local control rates were 62.2% [confidence interval (CI): 47.5-76.9], 42.3% (CI: 28.8-55.8) and 81.8% (CI: 69.9-94.0), respectively. There were no higher than Grade 2 adverse effects observed. CIRT for inoperable Stage II and III NSCLC could be implemented without severe adverse effects, but the clinical staging (including lymph node status) was inhomogeneous. In addition, the prescribed dose and fractionation were not standardized. Further data accumulation and a multiple centers prospective trial for evaluating clinical stage-based results are required.

Indexed as

Heavy Ion RadiotherapyAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Stagingcarbon-ion radiotherapymulticenter surveynon–small-cell lung cancerretrospective study

Identifiers

PMID28992088
PMCPMC5737392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.