ArticlePLoS computational biology2017
Object detection through search with a foveated visual system.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Foveated light-field compound imager.Science advances · 2026Article
- Learned foveal representations, not gaze-mediated information access, underlie perceptual advantages for canonical face configurations.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Distinct system-level computations underlie perceptual variation across the visual field.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Relating the perceived useful field of view to visual search in 2D Images and 3D volumetric images.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Foveated Light-Field Compound Imager.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal Evidence Accumulation Through Saccadic Sampling for Object Recognition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Low-level features predict perceived similarity for naturalistic images.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Maximizing valid eye-tracking data in human and macaque infants by optimizing calibration and adjusting areas of interest.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- The effects of eccentricity on attentional capture.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- Predictive processing of scenes and objects.Nature reviews psychology · 2024Article
- Human peripheral blur is optimal for object recognition.Vision research · 2022Article
- Could simplified stimuli change how the brain performs visual search tasks? A deep neural network study.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence for biotechnology and applied microbiology: Exploring research hotspots and frontiers.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- The Data Efficiency of Deep Learning Is Degraded by Unnecessary Input Dimensions.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Article
- Medical image quality metrics for foveated model observers.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021Article
- Studying visual search without an eye tracker: an assessment of artificial foveation.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2021Article
- Individual differences in crowding predict visual search performance.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- COCO-Search18 fixation dataset for predicting goal-directed attention control.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Under-exploration of Three-Dimensional Images Leads to Search Errors for Small Salient Targets.Current biology : CB · 2021Article
- Foveated Model Observers for Visual Search in 3D Medical Images.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans and many other species sense visual information with varying spatial resolution across the visual field (foveated vision) and deploy eye movements to actively sample regions of interests in scenes. The advantage of such varying resolution architecture is a reduced computational, hence metabolic cost. But what are the performance costs of such processing strategy relative to a scheme that processes the visual field at high spatial resolution? Here we first focus on visual search and combine object detectors from computer vision with a recent model of peripheral pooling regions found at the V1 layer of the human visual system. We develop a foveated object detector that processes the entire scene with varying resolution, uses retino-specific object detection classifiers to guide eye movements, aligns its fovea with regions of interest in the input image and integrates observations across multiple fixations. We compared the foveated object detector against a non-foveated version of the same object detector which processes the entire image at homogeneous high spatial resolution. We evaluated the accuracy of the foveated and non-foveated object detectors identifying 20 different objects classes in scenes from a standard computer vision data set (the PASCAL VOC 2007 dataset). We show that the foveated object detector can approximate the performance of the object detector with homogeneous high spatial resolution processing while bringing significant computational cost savings. Additionally, we assessed the impact of foveation on the computation of bottom-up saliency. An implementation of a simple foveated bottom-up saliency model with eye movements showed agreement in the selection of top salient regions of scenes with those selected by a non-foveated high resolution saliency model. Together, our results might help explain the evolution of foveated visual systems with eye movements as a solution that preserves perceptual performance in visual search while resulting in computational and metabolic savings to the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.