Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28991721›Full record

ArticleJournal of the neurological sciences2017

Clinical and imaging correlation in patients with pathologically confirmed tumefactive demyelinating lesions.

Matthew A Tremblay, Javier E Villanueva-Meyer, Soonmee Cha, Tarik Tihan, Jeffrey M Gelfand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the neurological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Tumefactive demyelination in older adults: A scoping review of published cases.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew A TremblayMS Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, Box 3014, 1500 Owens St, Ste 320, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States. Electronic address: mtremblay@uchc.edu.
Javier E Villanueva-MeyerNeuroradiology Division, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, 350 Parnassus Ave, Box 0336, Ste 307H, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628, United States. Electronic address: Javier.Villanueva-Meyer@ucsf.edu.
Soonmee ChaNeuroradiology Division, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, 350 Parnassus Ave, Box 0336, Ste 307H, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628, United States. Electronic address: Soonmee.Cha@ucsf.edu.
Tarik TihanDepartment of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, Box 0102, San Francisco, CA 94143-0102, United States. Electronic address: Tarik.Tihan@ucsf.edu.
Jeffrey M GelfandMS Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, Box 3014, 1500 Owens St, Ste 320, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States. Electronic address: Jeffrey.Gelfand@ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Biomedical Imaging for Clinician ScientistsT32EB001631 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI THOMAS M LINK · 2005 to 2026
$5.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo characterize clinical and imaging features in patients with pathologically confirmed demyelinating lesions.

methodsIn this retrospective chart review, we analyzed clinical-radiological-pathological correlations in patients >15years old who underwent brain biopsy at our institution between 2000 and 2015 and had inflammatory demyelination on neuropathology.

resultsOf 31 patients, the mean age was 42years (range 16 to 69years) and 55% were female. All but one of the biopsied lesions were considered tumefactive demyelinating lesions (TDLs) by imaging criteria, measuring >2cm on contrast-enhanced brain MRI. On clinical follow-up, the final diagnosis was a CNS malignancy in 2 patients (6.5%). In patients without malignant tumor, the TDL was solitary in 12 (41%) and multifocal in 17 (59%), with contrast enhancement in all but one case, primarily in an incomplete rim enhancement pattern (75.9%). Of 16 patients with at least 12months of clinical follow-up, 7 (43.8%) had a clinical relapse. Of patients without a prior neurologic history, relapse occurred in 2/7 (29%) in solitary TDL and 2/6 (33%) in multifocal lesions at initial presentation. Recurrent TDLs occurred in 3 patients, all with initially solitary TDLs. Stratifying by CSF analysis, 4 of 6 patients (67%) with either an elevated IgG Index or >2 oligoclonal bands suffered a clinical relapse compared to 2/8 (25%) with non-inflammatory CSF.

conclusionsPathologically confirmed TDLs call for careful clinical correlation, clinical follow-up and imaging surveillance. Although sometimes clinically monophasic, tumefactive demyelinating lesions carried nearly a 45% risk of near-term clinical relapse in our study, even when presenting initially as a solitary mass lesion.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBiopsyBrainDemyelinating DiseasesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultBrain biopsyDemyelinationMRIMultiple sclerosisNeuropathologyTumefactive

Identifiers

PMID28991721
PMCPMC5659762
OpenAlexW2743568085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.