Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28991027›Full record

ArticleAIDS (London, England)2017

Risk factors for anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in HIV-positive MSM: is targeted screening possible?

Matthijs L Siegenbeek van Heukelom, Elske Marra, Henry J C de Vries, Maarten F Schim van der Loeff, Jan M Prins

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Localized and Systemic Immune Response in Human Reproductive Tract.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. What's new in HIV dermatology?F1000Research · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthijs L Siegenbeek van HeukelomaDepartment of Internal Medicine bDepartment of Dermatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam cDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Elske Marra
Henry J C de Vries
Maarten F Schim van der Loeff
Jan M Prins
Academic Medical Center · NLGGD Amsterdam · NLApple (Israel) · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHIV-positive MSM are at increased risk for developing anal squamous cell carcinoma. Detection of precursor lesions of anal cancer [anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL)] is cumbersome and expensive. Our objective was to identify potential risk factors for anal HSIL in HIV-positive MSM to develop more stringent screening criteria.

designWe studied a cohort of MSM screened by high-resolution anoscopy at three HIV clinics in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

methodsFor every first high-resolution anoscopy performed in a patient, we analyzed five demographic and seven HIV-related potential risk factors for four different outcome measures: histologically proven anal HSIL vs. no squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL), HSIL-anal intraepithelial neoplasia 2 vs. no SIL, HSIL-anal intraepithelial neoplasia 3 vs. no SIL, and HSIL vs. no HSIL. We used univariable and multilevel, multivariable logistic regression.

resultsFrom 2008 through 2015, 497 out of 1678 (30%) screened HIV-positive MSM had anal HSIL. The mean age was 49 years (SD 9.6), 96% used combination antiretroviral therapy, and median duration of combination antiretroviral therapy use was 7.8 years (interquartile range 4.0-12.4). Increasing age [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.94, P = 0.006] and years living with suppressed viral load [1-5 years suppressed aOR 0.52 (95% CI 0.34-0.80), 5.01-10 years aOR 0.47 (95% CI 0.29-0.74), >10 years aOR 0.54 [0.34-0.87], all compared to less than 1 year suppressed, P = 0.009] were found to be protective for HSIL vs. no SIL.

conclusionYoung HIV-positive MSM without viral suppression are statistically at highest risk for anal HSIL, but given the high prevalence among all virally suppressed men, we advise that all HIV-positive MSM should be screened for HSIL.

Indexed as

Homosexuality, MaleAdultAnus NeoplasmsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNetherlandsRisk FactorsSquamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix

Identifiers

PMID28991027
PMCPMC5642330
OpenAlexW2756117983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.