Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28991023›Full record

ReviewAIDS (London, England)2017

Pre-exposure prophylaxis for MSM and transgender persons in early adopting countries.

Elske Hoornenborg, Douglas S Krakower, Maria Prins, Kenneth H Mayer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AIDS (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Determinants of PrEP Uptake, Intention and Awareness in the Netherlands: A Socio-Spatial Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elske HoornenborgaPublic Health Service of Amsterdam, Department of Infectious Diseases bAcademic Medical Center, Department of Infectious Diseases, Center for Immunity and Infection Amsterdam (CINIMA), University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands cBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Harvard Medical School dThe Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Douglas S Krakower
Maria Prins
Kenneth H Mayer

Funding

The impact of HIV viral diversity and cellular immunity on HIV pathogenesisP30AI060354 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI RAJESH T GANDHI · 2004 to 2026
$94.4M
Optimizing HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis through Shared Decision MakingK23MH098795 · NIMH · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI KRAKOWER, DOUGLAS SCOTT · 2012 to 2016
$873k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI060354NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH098795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a potent and underutilized HIV prevention tool. In this paper we review the state of knowledge regarding PrEP implementation for men who have sex with men and transgender persons in early adopting countries. We focus on implementation of PrEP in demonstration projects and clinical care, and describe the status of PrEP availability and uptake. We report on approaches to identifying appropriate PrEP candidates in real-world settings and on best practices for clinical monitoring. This includes the exclusion of undiagnosed HIV infection prior to PrEP initiation and longitudinal measurement of renal function, in light of safety data. Since adherence is the primary factor moderating the effectiveness of PrEP, we discuss effective adherence support interventions. Additionally, we review the evidence for risk compensation with PrEP use and opportunities to provide PrEP as part of comprehensive and inclusive preventive health programs. We summarize cost-effectiveness studies, including their variable conclusions because of differing underlying assumptions, and discuss the importance of budgetary impact for public health programs and health care insurers. Further, we emphasize a need for greater engagement of health care providers in PrEP to increase access. We conclude with recommendations for ways to improve future efforts at implementing PrEP.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityMedication AdherenceCost-Benefit AnalysisDisease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMalePre-Exposure ProphylaxisTransgender Persons

Identifiers

PMID28991023
PMCPMC5812254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.