Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28990921›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2017

Implementing Impact Evaluations of Malaria Control Interventions: Process, Lessons Learned, and Recommendations.

Christine L Hershey, Achuyt Bhattarai, Lia S Florey, Peter D McElroy, Carrie F Nielsen, Yazoume Yé, Erin Eckert, Ana Cláudia Franca-Koh, Estifanos Shargie, Ryuichi Komatsu and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Christine L HersheyPresident's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, District of Columbia.
Achuyt BhattaraiMalaria Branch and President's Malaria Initiative, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Lia S FloreyThe DHS Program, ICF International, Rockville, Maryland.
Peter D McElroyMalaria Branch and President's Malaria Initiative, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Carrie F NielsenMalaria Branch and President's Malaria Initiative, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Yazoume YéMEASURE Evaluation, ICF International, Rockville, Maryland.
Erin EckertPresident's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, District of Columbia.
Ana Cláudia Franca-KohMEASURE Evaluation, ICF International, Rockville, Maryland.
Estifanos ShargieThe Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ryuichi KomatsuThe Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Geneva, Switzerland.
Paul SmithsonIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Julie ThwingMalaria Branch and President's Malaria Initiative, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jules MihigoPresident's Malaria Initiative, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Bamako, Mali.
Samantha HerreraMEASURE Evaluation, ICF International, Rockville, Maryland.
Cameron TaylorThe DHS Program, ICF International, Rockville, Maryland.
Jui ShahMEASURE Evaluation, ICF International, Rockville, Maryland.
Eric MouzinRoll Back Malaria Partnership, Geneva, Switzerland.
Steven S YoonMalaria Branch and President's Malaria Initiative, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
S René SalgadoPresident's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, District of Columbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As funding for malaria control increased considerably over the past 10 years resulting in the expanded coverage of malaria control interventions, so did the need to measure the impact of these investments on malaria morbidity and mortality. Members of the Roll Back Malaria (RBM) Partnership undertook impact evaluations of malaria control programs at a time when there was little guidance in terms of the process for conducting an impact evaluation of a national-level malaria control program. The President's Malaria Initiative (PMI), as a member of the RBM Partnership, has provided financial and technical support for impact evaluations in 13 countries to date. On the basis of these experiences, PMI and its partners have developed a streamlined process for conducting the evaluations with a set of lessons learned and recommendations. Chief among these are: to ensure country ownership and involvement in the evaluations; to engage stakeholders throughout the process; to coordinate evaluations among interested partners to avoid duplication of efforts; to tailor the evaluation to the particular country context; to develop a standard methodology for the evaluations and a streamlined process for completion within a reasonable time; and to develop tailored dissemination products on the evaluation for a broad range of stakeholders. These key lessons learned and resulting recommendations will guide future impact evaluations of malaria control programs and other health programs.

Indexed as

National Health ProgramsAfrica South of the SaharaCommunicable Disease ControlHumansMalariaModels, TheoreticalMosquito ControlTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID28990921
PMCPMC5619934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.