Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28990874›Full record

ArticleThe journal of spinal cord medicine2019

Intensive Gait Treatment Using a Robot Suit Hybrid Assistive Limb in Acute Spinal Cord Infarction: Report of Two Cases.

Hiroki Watanabe, Aiki Marushima, Hiroaki Kawamoto, Hideki Kadone, Tomoyuki Ueno, Yukiyo Shimizu, Ayumu Endo, Yasushi Hada, Kousaku Saotome, Tetsuya Abe and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Use of Robots in Critical Care: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroki Watanabea Department of Neurosurgery , Graduate school of Comprehensive human sciences, University of Tsukuba , Tsukuba, Ibaraki , Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4436-5437
Aiki Marushimac Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine , University of Tsukuba , Tsukuba, Ibaraki , Japan.
Hiroaki Kawamotob Center for Cybernics Research , University of Tsukuba , Tsukuba, Ibaraki , Japan.
Hideki Kadoneb Center for Cybernics Research , University of Tsukuba , Tsukuba, Ibaraki , Japan.
Tomoyuki Uenof Department of Rehabilitation Medicine , University of Tsukuba Hospital , Tsukuba, Ibaraki , Japan.
Yukiyo Shimizuf Department of Rehabilitation Medicine , University of Tsukuba Hospital , Tsukuba, Ibaraki , Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7491-4516
Ayumu Endof Department of Rehabilitation Medicine , University of Tsukuba Hospital , Tsukuba, Ibaraki , Japan.
Yasushi Hadag Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine , University of Tsukuba , Tsukuba, Ibaraki , Japan.
Kousaku Saotomeb Center for Cybernics Research , University of Tsukuba , Tsukuba, Ibaraki , Japan.
Tetsuya Abeh Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine , University of Tsukuba , Tsukuba, Ibaraki , Japan.
Masashi Yamazakih Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine , University of Tsukuba , Tsukuba, Ibaraki , Japan.
Yoshiyuki Sankaib Center for Cybernics Research , University of Tsukuba , Tsukuba, Ibaraki , Japan.
Eiichi Ishikawac Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine , University of Tsukuba , Tsukuba, Ibaraki , Japan.
Akira Matsumurac Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine , University of Tsukuba , Tsukuba, Ibaraki , Japan.
University of Tsukuba · JPUniversity of Tsukuba Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextSpinal cord infarction (SCI) causes gait disturbance because of paresis, spasticity, and sensory disturbance of the lower limbs. There is no effective medical treatment for SCI, and conventional rehabilitation alone is the main approach to helping individuals work toward independent walking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of gait treatment using the Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) on acute SCI.

findingsA 61-year-old female and a 62-year-old male with incomplete paraplegia participated in this study. Our study participants received gait treatment with HAL 3-4 times per week, with a total of 7-8 sessions (20 min), in addition to conventional physical therapy. The American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale, Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI II), comfortable gait speed (CGS), stride, cadence, Barthel Index (BI), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), modified Rankin Scale (mRS), joint angles, and adverse effects were assessed prior to HAL treatment and post-HAL treatment. HAL facilitated intensive gait treatment in people during the acute phase after SCI. Improvements in LEMS, WISCI II, CGS, stride, cadence, BI, FIM, mRS, and joint angles were observed in both study participants. Furthermore, decreased spasticity in the gastrocnemius muscle was found in one participant as assessed by MAS.

conclusionGait treatment using HAL may be beneficial for paraplegic, non-ambulatory individuals with acute SCI. HAL may be useful for intensive gait treatment without increasing spasticity.

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceFemaleGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansInfarctionMaleMiddle AgedParaplegiaSpinal CordSpinal Cord IschemiaGait TreatmentHybrid Assistive LimbIndependent WalkingSpasticitySpinal Cord Infarction

Identifiers

PMID28990874
PMCPMC6522957
OpenAlexW2763440366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.