ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2017
Publication rates of abstracts presented at major interventional radiology conferences.
Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Oral Presentation to Publication: Outcomes of CIRSE 2021-2022 Abstracts.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- From abstract to article: Publication outcomes of oral presentations at the ESNR congresses between 2018 and 2022.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- The journey from congress to journal: publication patterns of ECR 2019 oral presentations.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- From congress to journal: publication outcomes of oral scientific presentations at the European society of urogenital radiology congresses.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Article
- Publication characteristics of oral presentations at the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology congresses.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Publication bias in diagnostic imaging: conference abstracts with positive conclusions are more likely to be published.European radiology · 2020Article
- Outcomes of abstracts presented at IADR general meetings in 2014 and 2015.British dental journal · 2020Article
- Who? What? Where? A snapshot of Nuclear Medicine Research Presentations from recent ANZSNM conferences in Australia and New Zealand.Asia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology · 2020Article
- Dissemination patterns of scientific abstracts presented at the first and second African Conference of Emergency Medicine.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2019Article
- A 20-year scoping review of the veterinary interventional radiology and interventional endoscopy literature (2000-2019).Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to determine the publication rate and factors predictive of publication of oral presentations at the annual meetings of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe (CIRSE) and the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR).
methodsKeywords and authors from oral presentation abstracts at the 2012 CIRSE and SIR annual meetings were used to search PubMed and GoogleScholar for subsequent publication. Logistic regression was performed to identify whether number of authors, country of origin, subject category, methodology, study type, and/or study results were predictive of publication.
resultsA total of 421 abstracts (CIRSE-126, SIR-295) met the inclusion criteria. The overall publication rate across both conferences was 44.9%. Time from conference presentation to publication was 15±8.9 months for CIRSE and 16.3±8.8 months for SIR (P > 0.05), with a combined time interval of 15.9±8.8 months for both. The median impact factor of published abstracts was 2.075 (interquartile range, 2.075-2.775) for CIRSE and 2.093 (2.075-2.856) for SIR (P > 0.05). The most common country of origin for published abstracts was Germany (27.1%) at CIRSE and the United States (69%) at SIR. Logistic regression did not identify factors that were predictive of future publication.
conclusionPublication rates were similar for CIRSE and SIR. Factors such as country of origin, topic of study and study results were not predictive of future publication. Authors should not be discouraged from submitting their work to journals based on these factors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.