Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28990288›Full record

ArticleJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2017

Comparing the broad socio-cognitive profile of youth with Williams syndrome and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

O Weisman, R Feldman, M Burg-Malki, M Keren, R Geva, G Diesendruck, D Gothelf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Deletion Syndrome 22q11.2: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

O WeismanThe Behavioral Neurogenetics Center, The Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
R FeldmanDepartment of Psychology and Gonda Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-5048-1381
M Burg-MalkiThe Behavioral Neurogenetics Center, The Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
M KerenSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
R GevaDepartment of Psychology and Gonda Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-5724-2153
G DiesendruckDepartment of Psychology and Gonda Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
D GothelfThe Behavioral Neurogenetics Center, The Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Tel Aviv University · ILBar-Ilan University · IL

Funding

"4/5 International Consortium on Brain and Behavior in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome"U01MH101722 · NIMH · KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN · PI SWILLEN, ANN · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH101722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous studies have assessed the socio-cognitive profile in Williams syndrome (WS) and, independently, in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS). Yet, a cross-syndrome comparison of these abilities between individuals with these two syndromes with known social deficits has not been conducted.

methodsEighty-two children participated in four study groups: WS (n = 18), 22q112.DS (n = 24), age-matched individuals with idiopathic developmental disability (IDD; n = 20) and typically developing (TD) controls (n = 20). Participants completed four socio-cognitive tests: facial emotion recognition, mental state attribution, differentiating real from apparent emotions and trait inference based on motives and actions-outcomes.

resultsThe current findings demonstrate that children with WS were better in labelling happy faces compared with children with 22q11.2DS, partially reflecting their exaggerated social drive. In the false belief task, however, the WS and IDD groups performed poorly compared with the 22q11.2DS group, possibly due to their difficulty to interpret subtle social cues. When asked to identify the gap between real-negative vs. apparent-positive emotions, the 22q11.2DS group performed similarly to TD children but better than the WS group, possibly due to their anxious personality and their innate bias towards negatively valence cues. Finally, individuals with WS were more willing to become friends with a story character even when the character's motives were negative, reflecting their difficulty to avoid potentially harmful real-life situations.

conclusionsOverall, our multi-facet socio-cognitive battery uncovered strengths and weaknesses in social cognition that are syndrome-specific, shared among the genetic syndromes, or common to the three clinical groups compared with healthy controls. Our findings underscore the need to devise age-specific and condition-specific assessment tools and intervention programs towards improving these children's socio-cognitive deficits.

Indexed as

Social PerceptionAdolescentChildDevelopmental DisabilitiesDiGeorge SyndromeEmotionsFacial RecognitionFemaleHumansMaleTheory of MindWilliams SyndromechildrenDiGeorgeneurogenetic disorderssocial cognitiontheory of mind (ToM)velocardiofacial syndrome

Identifiers

PMID28990288
PMCPMC5696079
OpenAlexW2763312923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.