Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28990261›Full record

ArticleHead & neck2017

Heated air humidification versus cold air nebulization in newly tracheostomized patients.

Richard Birk, Alexander Händel, Angela Wenzel, Benedikt Kramer, Christoph Aderhold, Karl Hörmann, Boris A Stuck, J Ulrich Sommer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Head & neck, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04654754 (Aerosol Particle Concentrations Among Different Oxygen Devices for Spontaneous Breathing Patients With Tracheostomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04654754 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Aerosol Particle Concentrations Among Different Oxygen Devices for Spontaneous Breathing Patients With Tracheostomy: a Randomized Cross-over Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorJie LiRan2020 to 2021Enrolled12ConditionsTransmission, Patient-ProfessionalArmshigh-flow high humidity oxygen device with tracheostomy adapter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Impact of BepanthenEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard BirkDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Marburg, Philips-Universität Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4810-280X
Alexander HändelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Germany.
Angela WenzelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Germany.
Benedikt KramerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph AderholdDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3227-1430
Karl HörmannDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Germany.
Boris A StuckDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Marburg, Philips-Universität Marburg, Germany.
J Ulrich SommerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEPhilips (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter tracheostomy, the airway lacks an essential mechanism for warming and humidifying the inspired air with the consequent functional impairment and discomfort. The purpose of this study was to compare airway hydration with cold-air nebulization versus heated high-flow humidification on medical interventions and tracheal ciliary beat frequency (CBF).

methodsNewly tracheostomized patients (n = 20) were treated either with cold-air nebulization or heated humidification. The number of required tracheal suctioning procedures to clean the trachea and tracheal CBF were assessed.

resultsThe number of required suctions per day was significantly lower in the heated humidification group with medians 3 versus 5 times per day. Mean CBF was significantly higher in the heated humidification group (6.36 ± 1.49 Hz) compared to the cold-air nebulization group (3.99 ± 1.39 Hz).

conclusionThe data suggest that heated humidification enhanced mucociliary transport leading to a reduced number of required suctioning procedures in the trachea, which may improve postoperative patient care.

Indexed as

Cold TemperatureHot TemperatureAdministration, InhalationAdultAgedAirway ManagementCohort StudiesFemaleGermanyHead and Neck NeoplasmsHospitals, UniversityHumansMaleMiddle AgedNebulizers and VaporizersOxygen Inhalation Therapyhumidificationnurse caretracheostomytracheostomy care ciliary beat frequency (CBF)

Identifiers

PMID28990261
PMCPMC5698730
OpenAlexW2763534326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.