ArticleAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery2017
Two cases of ALPPS procedure: simultaneous ALPPS and colorectal resection and ALPPS procedure for hepatic malignancy larger than 15 centimeter.
Article in Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Italian Consensus on minimally invasive simultaneous resections for synchronous liver metastasis and primary colorectal cancer: A Delphi methodology.Updates in surgery · 2021Article
- Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) in colorectal liver metastases: review of the literature.Clinical and experimental hepatology · 2021Review
- The role of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy in the management of patients with colorectal liver metastasis.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2020Review
- Role of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation in staged hepatectomy (ALPPS)-strategy for colorectal liver metastases.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has recently been introduced as a new surgical technique to increase future liver remnant in patients with marginal liver volume contemplating major liver resection. We herein present two cases. Case 1: a 68-year-old male patient with colorectal liver metastasis was referred to our department. The future liver remnant (FLR) was 22%. We performed first-stage ALPPS and colorectal surgery concurrently and second stage operation was performed 8 days later. The patient discharged 28 days after the first-stage ALPPS procedure. Case 2: a 69-year-old male patient with a huge hepatic mass was referred for hepatic surgery. The FLR was 19%. After the first stage of the ALPPS procedure, acute renal failure and posthepatectomy liver failure occurred. The patient began to recover on the 5th postoperative day. At 10 days after the first stage, the patient completed the second-stage procedure. The patient discharged 23 days after the first-stage ALPPS procedure. So far many studies are currently underway to identify factors associated with the morbidity and mortality of the ALPPS procedure, it is necessary to continue follow-up studies and observe the results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.