ArticleCurrent transplantation reports2017
Xenotransplantation: Where Are We with Potential Kidney Recipients? Recent Progress and Potential Future Clinical Trials.
Article in Current transplantation reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developments in kidney xenotransplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Transplanting organs from pigs to humans.Science immunology · 2019Review
- Justification of specific genetic modifications in pigs for clinical organ xenotransplantation.Xenotransplantation · 2019Review
- IXA Honorary Member Lecture, 2017: The long and winding road to tolerance.Xenotransplantation · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeInter-species transplantation, xenotransplantation, is becoming a realistic strategy to solve the organ shortage crisis. Here we focus on seminal publications that have driven research in xenotransplantation, as well as recently published literature and future endeavors. RECENT
findingsAdvances in gene editing technology have allowed for the efficient production of multi-transgenic porcine donors leading improved xenograft survival in baboons, up to 2-years following heterotopic heart xenotransplantation and from weeks to several months following life-supporting kidney xenotransplanation. As technology evolves, additional challenges have arisen, including the development of proteinuria, early graft loss associated with porcine CMV, disparities in organ growth between donors and recipients as well as high-dose continuous immunosuppression requirements. To address these issues, our laboratory developed a tolerance-inducing protocol which has allowed for >6 months survival of a life-supporting kidney with further approaches currently underway to address the challenges mentioned above. SUMMARY: Our recent findings, reviewed in this article, led us to develop methods to overcome obstacles, which, in conjunction with the work of others, are promising for future clinical applications of xenotransplantation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.