Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28989791›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2017

Sweepstake evolution revealed by population-genetic analysis of copy-number alterations in single genomes of breast cancer.

Mamoru Kato, Daniel A Vasco, Ryuichi Sugino, Daichi Narushima, Alexander Krasnitz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Onco-Breastomics: An Eco-Evo-Devo Holistic Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mamoru KatoDepartment of Bioinformatics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuuoo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8485-8316
Daniel A VascoDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Ryuichi SuginoSchool of Advanced Sciences, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Hayama, Kanagawa 240-0193, Japan.
Daichi NarushimaDepartment of Bioinformatics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuuoo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Alexander KrasnitzCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Simons Center for Quantitative Biology, One Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA.
National Cancer Centre Japan · JPCold Spring Harbor Laboratory · USThe Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI · JPUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Single-Cell Biology Shared ResourceP30CA045508 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI John Edward Moses · 1987 to 2026
$118.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA045508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell sequencing is a promising technology that can address cancer cell evolution by identifying genetic alterations in individual cells. In a recent study, genome-wide DNA copy numbers of single cells were accurately quantified by single-cell sequencing in breast cancers. Phylogenetic-tree analysis revealed genetically distinct populations, each consisting of homogeneous cells. Bioinformatics methods based on population genetics should be further developed to quantitatively analyse the single-cell sequencing data. We developed a bioinformatics framework that was combined with molecular-evolution theories to analyse copy-number losses. This analysis revealed that most deletions in the breast cancers at the single-cell level were generated by simple stochastic processes. A non-standard type of coalescent theory, the multiple-merger coalescent model, aided by approximate Bayesian computation fit well with the data, allowing us to estimate the population-genetic parameters in addition to false-positive and false-negative rates. The estimated parameters suggest that the cancer cells underwent sweepstake evolution, where only one or very few parental cells produced a descendent cell population. We conclude that breast cancer cells successively substitute in a tumour mass, and the high reproduction of only a portion of cancer cells may confer high adaptability to this cancer.

Indexed as

bioinformaticscancer genomicscoalescent theorycopy-number alterationmolecular evolutionsingle-cell sequencing

Identifiers

PMID28989791
PMCPMC5627131
OpenAlexW2759718701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.