Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28989768›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2017

Function and flexibility of object exploration in kea and New Caledonian crows.

Megan L Lambert, Martina Schiestl, Raoul Schwing, Alex H Taylor, Gyula K Gajdon, Katie E Slocombe, Amanda M Seed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Epistemic Curiosity in Kea Parrots and Human Children.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ratcheting up tool innovation in Goffin's cockatoos (Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Innovative problem solving in macaws.Learning & behavior · 2021
    Article
  13. Do Nonhumans Seek Explanations?Animal behavior and cognition · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Megan L LambertDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3618-7260
Martina SchiestlHaidlhof Research Station, University of Vienna and University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Raoul SchwingComparative Cognition Unit, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4663-8432
Alex H TaylorDepartment of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3492-7667
Gyula K GajdonComparative Cognition Unit, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Katie E SlocombeDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7310-1887
Amanda M SeedSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A range of non-human animals frequently manipulate and explore objects in their environment, which may enable them to learn about physical properties and potentially form more abstract concepts of properties such as weight and rigidity. Whether animals can apply the information learned during their exploration to solve novel problems, however, and whether they actually change their exploratory behaviour to seek functional information about objects have not been fully explored. We allowed kea (

Indexed as

cognitioncorvidobject playobject propertiesparrottool use

Identifiers

PMID28989768
PMCPMC5627108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.