Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28989422›Full record

ArticleJournal of infection prevention2015

Exploring the approaches used to teach concepts of hand hygiene to Australian medical students.

Rajneesh Kaur, Husna Razee, Holly Seale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of infection prevention, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rajneesh KaurUNSW Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Husna RazeeUNSW Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Holly SealeUNSW Australia, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent audit data has revealed that the hand hygiene (HH) rates of Australian medical students is suboptimal. It has been suggested that new approaches are needed to teach students about infection control. As a first step, we undertook a study to determine the current educational approaches used to teach Australian medical students about HH. Secondly, this study aimed to explore the perceived barriers and to explore what other teaching approaches could be used to improve the levels of knowledge and compliance.

methodsA self-administered questionnaire was sent to the Dean of Medical Education at each of the medical schools in late 2012.

resultsOf the 19 medical schools in Australia, 17 agreed to participate. The most commonly reported approaches currently used to teach students about HH are skills stations (17/17) and case scenarios/lectures (15/17). Clinical practical exams (15/17) and competency checks (11/17) are mostly used to assess the HH practices of medical students. Participants nominated the following as barriers to improving HH compliance: negative role modelling by senior doctors, and negative attitudes of students. Practical exercises (15/17), online teaching (12/17) and reflection (12/17) were suggested as other useful approaches that could be used to teach these concepts.

conclusionPractical laboratory-based approaches were suggested as the most useful teaching and learning approach. Given the trend towards blended learning, universities may want to consider new HH teaching approaches that combine campus-based learning with online components and reflection. Early exposure and the continued reinforcement of HH concepts through the student's medical degree are essential.

Indexed as

Educationhand hygienehealthcare-associated infectionsinfection controlqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID28989422
PMCPMC5074195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.