Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28989324›Full record

ArticleSex education2016

Positive and Negative Aspects of Relationship Quality and Unprotected Sex among Young Women.

Sonya S Brady, Sandra K Gruber, Julian A Wolfson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sex education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sonya S BradyDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, USA.
Sandra K GruberDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, USA.
Julian A WolfsonDivision of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, USA.
University of Minnesota · USMinnesota Department of Health · US

Funding

An Interactive Website to Reduce HIV Risk Behavior among AdolescentsR34MH086320 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BRADY, SONYA S · 2009 to 2010
$680k
NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH086320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine both positive and negative aspects of relationship quality in relation to condom use. Sexually active young women aged 14-18 years (n=111; 34% non-white) were recruited from community clinics and schools in the Midwest USA and provided data via an online survey. The number of unprotected sex acts in the past month with the most recent male partner was regressed on relationship quality with that partner, adjusting for demographics and other characteristics. Negative relationship quality was associated with a greater number of unprotected sex acts among women reporting a low level of positive relationship quality and among women taking hormonal/IUD contraception. Positive relationship quality was associated with unprotected sex among women who reported multiple partners in the past month. Both positive and negative aspects of relationship quality may confer risk for unprotected sex. This risk appears modified by patterns of contraceptive use and other sexual behaviours. Health professionals may be more effective in promoting condom use if they ask questions about both positive and negative aspects of young people's relationship quality and tailor their conversations based on the responses received.

Indexed as

condom useemotional abuserelationship qualityyoung women, USA

Identifiers

PMID28989324
PMCPMC5628753
OpenAlexW2274457645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.