Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28989276›Full record

ArticleDrugs & therapy perspectives : for rational drug selection and use2017

Stability of medicines after repackaging into multicompartment compliance aids: eight criteria for detection of visual alteration.

Valerie Albert, Michael Lanz, Georgios Imanidis, Kurt E Hersberger, Isabelle Arnet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs & therapy perspectives : for rational drug selection and use, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Valerie AlbertPharmaceutical Care Research Group, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5604-5468
Michael LanzInstitute of Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Life Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Mattenstrasse 24a, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Georgios ImanidisInstitute of Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Life Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Mattenstrasse 24a, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Kurt E HersbergerPharmaceutical Care Research Group, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Isabelle ArnetPharmaceutical Care Research Group, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMulticompartment compliance aids (MCA) are widely used by patients. They support the management of medication and reduce unintentional nonadherence. MCA are filled with medicines unpacked from their original packaging. Swiss pharmacists currently provide MCA for 1-2 weeks, although little and controversial information exists on the stability of repackaged medicines.

objectiveWe aimed to validate the usefulness of a simple screening method capable of detecting visual stability problems with repackaged medicines.

methodsWe selected eight criteria for solid formulations from

resultsSix alterations (rough surface, cracking, mottling, discoloration, swelling, and crushing) were observed at accelerated conditions. No alteration was observed at room temperature, except for the chipping of tablets that had been stuck to cold seal glue.

conclusionThe eight criteria can detect alterations of the appearance of oral solid medicines repackaged in MCA. In the absence of specific guidelines, they can serve as a simple screening method in community pharmacies for identifying medicines unsuitable for repackaging.

Identifiers

PMID28989276
PMCPMC5610216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.