Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28988858›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2017

An Anatomically Constrained Model for Path Integration in the Bee Brain.

Thomas Stone, Barbara Webb, Andrea Adden, Nicolai Ben Weddig, Anna Honkanen, Rachel Templin, William Wcislo, Luca Scimeca, Eric Warrant, Stanley Heinze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 169 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
169citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

169 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Transcriptional predictors of rescue behaviour in ants.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Ballistic food approaches inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The diversity of lepidopteran spatial orientation strategies - neuronal mechanisms and emerging challenges in a changing world.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Neurons sensitive to sky compass signals in the brain of the Madeira cockroach Rhyparobia maderae.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  20. Review

109 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Thomas StoneSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Barbara WebbSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Andrea AddenLund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Nicolai Ben WeddigSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Anna HonkanenLund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Rachel TemplinQueensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
William WcisloSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama City, Panama.
Luca ScimecaSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Eric WarrantLund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Stanley HeinzeLund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. Electronic address: stanley.heinze@biol.lu.se.

Funding

European Research Council 714599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Path integration is a widespread navigational strategy in which directional changes and distance covered are continuously integrated on an outward journey, enabling a straight-line return to home. Bees use vision for this task-a celestial-cue-based visual compass and an optic-flow-based visual odometer-but the underlying neural integration mechanisms are unknown. Using intracellular electrophysiology, we show that polarized-light-based compass neurons and optic-flow-based speed-encoding neurons converge in the central complex of the bee brain, and through block-face electron microscopy, we identify potential integrator cells. Based on plausible output targets for these cells, we propose a complete circuit for path integration and steering in the central complex, with anatomically identified neurons suggested for each processing step. The resulting model circuit is thus fully constrained biologically and provides a functional interpretation for many previously unexplained architectural features of the central complex. Moreover, we show that the receptive fields of the newly discovered speed neurons can support path integration for the holonomic motion (i.e., a ground velocity that is not precisely aligned with body orientation) typical of bee flight, a feature not captured in any previously proposed model of path integration. In a broader context, the model circuit presented provides a general mechanism for producing steering signals by comparing current and desired headings-suggesting a more basic function for central complex connectivity, from which path integration may have evolved.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeesBrainModels, AnatomicSpace PerceptionSpatial Navigationcentral complexcircuit modelingcompass orientationinsect brainnavigationneuroanatomyoptic flowpath integrationpolarized lightrobotics

Identifiers

PMID28988858
PMCPMC6196076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.