ArticleCell systems2017
A Community Challenge for Inferring Genetic Predictors of Gene Essentialities through Analysis of a Functional Screen of Cancer Cell Lines.
Article in Cell systems, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- TARGET-SL: precision essential gene prediction using driver prioritisation and synthetic lethality.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Robust evaluation of deep learning-based representation methods for survival and gene essentiality prediction on bulk RNA-seq data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Predicting gene knockout effects from expression data.BMC medical genomics · 2023Article
- Fast and interpretable genomic data analysis using multiple approximate kernel learning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- PrognosiT: Pathway/gene set-based tumour volume prediction using multiple kernel learning.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Predicting and characterizing a cancer dependency map of tumors with deep learning.Science advances · 2021Article
- Crowdsourcing assessment of maternal blood multi-omics for predicting gestational age and preterm birth.Cell reports. Medicine · 2021Article
- Accurate cancer phenotype prediction with AKLIMATE, a stacked kernel learner integrating multimodal genomic data and pathway knowledge.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- High-throughput synthetic rescue for exhaustive characterization of suppressor mutations in human genes.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020Review
- Signatures of cell death and proliferation in perturbation transcriptomics data-from confounding factor to effective prediction.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
46 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We report the results of a DREAM challenge designed to predict relative genetic essentialities based on a novel dataset testing 98,000 shRNAs against 149 molecularly characterized cancer cell lines. We analyzed the results of over 3,000 submissions over a period of 4 months. We found that algorithms combining essentiality data across multiple genes demonstrated increased accuracy; gene expression was the most informative molecular data type; the identity of the gene being predicted was far more important than the modeling strategy; well-predicted genes and selected molecular features showed enrichment in functional categories; and frequently selected expression features correlated with survival in primary tumors. This study establishes benchmarks for gene essentiality prediction, presents a community resource for future comparison with this benchmark, and provides insights into factors influencing the ability to predict gene essentiality from functional genetic screens. This study also demonstrates the value of releasing pre-publication data publicly to engage the community in an open research collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.