Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28988653›Full record

ArticleUrologic oncology2018

Metastasectomy in older adults with urothelial carcinoma: Population-based analysis of use and outcomes.

Bishoy M Faltas, Renee L Gennarelli, Elena Elkin, Daniel P Nguyen, Jim Hu, Scott T Tagawa

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urologic oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bishoy M FaltasDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill-Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Renee L GennarelliCenter for Health Policy and Outcomes, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Elena ElkinCenter for Health Policy and Outcomes, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Daniel P NguyenDepartment of Urology, Weill-Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Jim HuDepartment of Urology, Weill-Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Scott T TagawaDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill-Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Weill-Cornell Medicine, New York, NY. Electronic address: stt2007@med.cornell.edu.
Cornell University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Disparities in COVID Disease Severity and Outcomes in New York CityUL1TR002384 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JULIANNE L IMPERATO-MCGINLEY · 2017 to 2026
$86.2M
Clinical and Translational Science CenterKL2TR000458 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI IMPERATO-MCGINLEY, JULIANNE L · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000458NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002384NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, ureter, or renal pelvis is a highly aggressive disease with poor outcomes. Even with platinum-based chemotherapy, the median overall survival is 15 months and the 5-year survival is only 15%. The role of metastasectomy in urothelial carcinoma is currently undefined.

objectiveTo examine the use and outcomes of metastasectomy in older patients with urothelial carcinoma in a large population-based dataset. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsWe conducted a SEER-Medicare study, and from 70,648 urothelial carcinoma patients who met inclusion criteria, we identified 497 patients who had at least 1 metastasectomy during a median follow-up of 40 months. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary study endpoints were metastasectomy use, the length of stay for metastasectomy, complications, and overall survival following metastasectomy. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and readmission rate following metastasectomy. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We identified 497 patients meeting inclusion criteria who had at least 1 metastasectomy during the study period including 24 patients who had more than 1 procedure resulting in a total of 523 metastasectomies. The median overall survival after the first metastasectomy was 19 months (95% CI: 15-23; interquartile range: 4-74). In this selected patient population, over a third of patients were alive at 3 years. In the 476 patients who had evaluable discharge dates, the median length of stay after metastasectomy was 7 days (IQR: 4-12), and 10% of patients had at least 1 complication within 30 days of discharge. Thirty-day mortality after metastasectomy was 10% (n = 53/523) and was largely driven by the mortality associated with resections of urothelial cancer brain metastases.

conclusionsIn well-selected patients with urothelial carcinoma with a reasonable life expectancy, resection of metastatic lesions is safe and is associated with long-term survival and potential cures.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMetastasectomySurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeUrologic NeoplasmsBladder CancerMetastasectomyMetastasisSEER-MedicareSurgeryUrothelial Cancer

Identifiers

PMID28988653
PMCPMC5793883
OpenAlexW2763267034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.