ArticleJournal of cardiovascular electrophysiology2018
Re-evaluating pathogenicity of variants associated with the long QT syndrome.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional Profiling ofCirculation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2025Article
- Predicting the Damaging Potential of UncharacterizedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Cardiac Genetic Investigation of Sudden Infant and Early Childhood Death: A Study From Victims to Families.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Article
- L-Type Calcium Channel: Predicting Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic Status for Variants of Uncertain Clinical Significance.Membranes · 2021Article
- Interpretation of Incidental Genetic Findings Localizing to Genes Associated With Cardiac Channelopathies and Cardiomyopathies.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2021Article
- Intersegment Contacts of Potentially Damaging Variants of Cardiac Sodium Channel.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- A de novo BRPF1 variant in a case of Sudden Unexplained Death in Childhood.European journal of medical genetics · 2020Article
- Sequencing of uncertain significance.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionGenetic testing for congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) has become common. Recent studies have shown that some variants labelled as pathogenic might be misclassified due to sparse case reports and relatively common allele frequencies (AF) in the general population. This study aims to evaluate the presence of LQTS-associated variants in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) population, and assess the functional impact of these variants. METHODS AND
resultsVariants associated with LQTS from the Human Gene Mutation Database were extracted and matched to the gnomAD to evaluate population-based AF. We used MetaSVM to predict the function of LQTS variants. Allele distribution by protein topology in KCNQ1, KCNH2, and SCN5A was compared between gnomAD (n = 123,136) and a cohort of LQTS patients aggregated from eight published studies (n = 2,683). Among the 1,415 LQTS-associated single nucleotide variants in 30 genes, 347 (25%) are present in gnomAD; 24% of the 347 variants were predicted as functionally tolerated compared with 4% of variants not present in gnomAD (P < 0.001). Of the 347 pathogenic variants in gnomAD, seven (2%) had an AF of ≥ 0.001 and 65 (19%) variants had an AF of ≥ 0.0001. In KCNQ1, KCNH2, and SCN5A, allele distribution by protein functional region was significantly different with gnomAD alleles appearing less frequently in highly pathogenic domains than case alleles.
conclusionA significant number of LQTS variants have insufficient evidence for pathogenicity and relatively common AF in the general population. Caution should be used when ascribing pathogenicity to these variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.