Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28988414›Full record

ArticleThe Laryngoscope2018

Upper esophageal sphincter augmentation reduces pharyngeal reflux in nasogastric tube-fed patients.

Hongmei Jiao, Ling Mei, Chenyang Liang, Yun Dai, Zhifang Fu, Lihong Wu, Patrick Sanvanson, Reza Shaker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Laryngoscope, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Role of prehabilitative gastrostomy tube feeding to bridge severely malnourished surgically unfit achalasia patients to per-oral endoscopic myotomy.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Hongmei JiaoDepartment of Geriatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ling MeiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, U.S.A.
Chenyang LiangDepartment of Radiology, Unicare ENT Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yun DaiDepartment of Geriatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhifang FuDepartment of Geriatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lihong WuDepartment of Geriatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Patrick SanvansonDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, U.S.A.
Reza ShakerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0001-6079-1017
Peking University · CNMedical College of Wisconsin · USUnicare · NO

Funding

The Physiology of the Pharyngo-Esophageal JunctionP01DK068051 · NIDDK · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI SHAKER, REZA NONE · 2007 to 2018
$11.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK068051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives/hypothesisAspiration of gastric refluxate is one of the most commonly observed complications among long-term nasogastric tube (NGT) fed patients. The upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure barrier is the main defense mechanism against pharyngeal reflux of gastric contents. Our objective was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the UES assist device (UES-AD) in preventing gastric reflux through the UES in long-term NGT-fed patients. STUDY

designSelf-Controlled Case series.

methodsWe studied 10 patients (mean age = 90.6 ± 3.4 years, four females) with dysphagia caused by stroke or dementia who were fed for 0.5 to 5 years (median = 3 years) by NGT. External pressures of 20 to 30 mm Hg were applied by using a handmade UES-AD, which was started 2 hours after the beginning of NGT infusion and was alternated between periods of 2 hours on and 2 hours off, for a total of 12 hours. Placement of the impedance sensors within the UES was guided by high-resolution manometry. Trans-UES and intraesophageal reflux events were recorded by using 24-hour combined pH-impedance measurements.

resultsNo aspiration pneumonia events were noted in the period 1 month before or during the study in any of the cohort. Baseline UES pressure averaged 17.5 ± 9.4 mm Hg and was increased to 38.9 ± 11.9mm Hg after application of the UES-AD. Overall frequency of trans-UES reflux decreased significantly with the UES-AD compared to without (0.8 ± 0.9 vs. 3.3 ± 2.8, P < .05 for the 12-hour study period). There was no effect of the UES-AD on esophageal reflux events (7.4 ± 4.4 vs. 6.4 ± 3.0, P > .05).

conclusionsUES-AD significantly decreases the number of trans-UES reflux events and can potentially reduce the aspiration risk associated with NGT feeding. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:1310-1315, 2018.

Indexed as

Esophageal Sphincter, UpperAged, 80 and overEnteral NutritionFemaleGastroesophageal RefluxHumansIntubation, GastrointestinalMaleManometryPressureRadiography, ThoracicAspirationimpedance monitoringpharyngeal reflux

Identifiers

PMID28988414
PMCPMC5889969
OpenAlexW2763380589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.