Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28988380›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2018

Tumor-infiltrating immune cells as potential biomarkers predicting response to treatment and survival in patients with metastatic melanoma receiving ipilimumab therapy.

Tímea Balatoni, Anita Mohos, Eszter Papp, Tímea Sebestyén, Gabriella Liszkay, Judit Oláh, Anita Varga, Zsuzsanna Lengyel, Gabriella Emri, István Gaudi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tímea BalatoniDepartment of Oncodermatology, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.
Anita Mohos1st Institute of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Eszter PappDepartment of Surgical and Molecular Pathology, National Institute of Oncology, 7-9. Ráth György u., Budapest, H-1122, Hungary.
Tímea SebestyénDepartment of Pathology, St. John's Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.
Gabriella LiszkayDepartment of Oncodermatology, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.
Judit OláhDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Anita VargaDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Zsuzsanna LengyelDepartment of Dermatology, Venerology and Oncodermatology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Gabriella EmriDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
István GaudiNational Korányi Institute of TB and Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary.
Andrea LadányiDepartment of Surgical and Molecular Pathology, National Institute of Oncology, 7-9. Ráth György u., Budapest, H-1122, Hungary. ladanyi@oncol.hu.ORCID 0000-0001-9304-8473

Funding

European Union GINOP_2.3.2-15-2016-00020National Research, Development and Innovation Office K105132National Research, Development and Innovation Office K116295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies targeting immune checkpoints are gaining ground in the treatment of melanoma and other cancers, and considerable effort is made to identify biomarkers predicting the efficacy of these therapies. Our retrospective study was performed on surgical tissue samples (52 lymph nodes and 34 cutaneous/subcutaneous metastases) from 30 patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab. Using a panel of 11 antibodies against different immune cell types, intratumoral immune cell densities were determined and evaluated in relation to response to ipilimumab treatment and disease outcome. For most markers studied, median immune cell densities were at least two times higher in lymph node metastases compared to skin/subcutaneous ones; therefore, the prognostic and predictive associations of immune cell infiltration were evaluated separately in the two groups of metastases as well as in all samples as a whole. Higher prevalence of several immune cell types was seen in lymph node metastases of the responders compared to non-responders, particularly FOXP3

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiomarkersFemaleHumansIpilimumabLymphatic MetastasisLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiomarkersIpilimumabBiomarkerImmunotherapyIpilimumabMelanomaTumor-infiltrating immune cells

Identifiers

PMID28988380
PMCPMC11028067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.