Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28988363›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2018

Safety of shortened infusion times for combined ipilimumab and nivolumab.

Maximilian Gassenmaier, Hans-Peter Lipp, Alexander Scheu, Nikolaus Benjamin Wagner, Lukas Kofler, Alisa Mueller, Dennis Doecker, Thomas Kurt Eigentler, Claus Garbe, Andrea Forschner

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maximilian GassenmaierDepartment of Dermatology, Center for Dermatooncology, Eberhard-Karls-University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Hans-Peter LippDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Eberhard-Karls-University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Alexander ScheuDepartment of Dermatology, Center for Dermatooncology, Eberhard-Karls-University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Nikolaus Benjamin WagnerDepartment of Dermatology, Center for Dermatooncology, Eberhard-Karls-University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Lukas KoflerDepartment of Dermatology, Center for Dermatooncology, Eberhard-Karls-University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Alisa MuellerDepartment of Dermatology, Center for Dermatooncology, Eberhard-Karls-University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Dennis DoeckerDepartment of Dermatology, Center for Dermatooncology, Eberhard-Karls-University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Thomas Kurt EigentlerDepartment of Dermatology, Center for Dermatooncology, Eberhard-Karls-University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Claus GarbeDepartment of Dermatology, Center for Dermatooncology, Eberhard-Karls-University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Andrea ForschnerDepartment of Dermatology, Center for Dermatooncology, Eberhard-Karls-University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany. andrea.forschner@med.uni-tuebingen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombined ipilimumab and nivolumab induces encouraging response rates in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma. However, the approved protocol for dual checkpoint inhibition (3 mg/kg ipilimumab over 90 min and 1 mg/kg nivolumab over 60 min) is time-intensive and several trials have shown that both single agents can be safely administered at faster infusion rates.

aimTo investigate whether combined checkpoint inhibition with 3 mg/kg ipilimumab and 1 mg/kg nivolumab can be safely administered over 30 min per agent. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe reviewed the rate of infusion-related reactions (IRRs) in the first 12 months of our single-institution experience using shortened infusion times for combined checkpoint inhibition with ipilimumab and nivolumab.

resultsBetween May 24, 2016 and June 10, 2017, a total of 46 melanoma patients received 100 shortened cycles of combined 3 mg/kg ipilimumab and 1 mg/kg nivolumab. One patient (2.2%; 1/46) had a questionable reaction after administration of 1 mg/kg nivolumab over 30 min, but none of the other patients had a bona fide IRR.

conclusionsShortened infusion times for combined ipilimumab and nivolumab treatment are safe, thereby facilitating a more efficient use of outpatient facilities and enhancing patient's convenience.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousIpilimumabMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNivolumabRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, MonoclonalIpilimumabNivolumabImmunotherapyInfusion rateInfusion-related reactionIpilimumabMelanomaNivolumab

Identifiers

PMID28988363
PMCPMC11028165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.