Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28988183›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2017

Neurological outcome after minimal invasive coronary artery surgery (NOMICS): protocol for an observational prospective cohort study.

Kristof Nijs, Jeroen Vandenbrande, Fidel Vaqueriza, Jean-Paul Ory, Alaaddin Yilmaz, Pascal Starinieri, Jasperina Dubois, Luc Jamaer, Ingrid Arijs, Björn Stessel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02979782 (Neurological Outcome After Minimal Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Graft), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02979782 completednot on this map

Neurological Outcome After Minimal Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: a Single-centre Prospective Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorJessa HospitalRan2016 to 2018Enrolled180ConditionsPostoperative Cognitive Dysfunction, Cerebrovascular Accident, DeliriumArmsEndo-CABG, PCI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristof NijsDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Jeroen VandenbrandeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Fidel VaquerizaFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Jean-Paul OryDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Alaaddin YilmazDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Pascal StarinieriDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Jasperina DuboisDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Luc JamaerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Ingrid ArijsFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Björn StesselDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Jessa Hospital · BEHasselt University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdverse neurocognitive outcomes are still an important cause of morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. The most common neurocognitive disorders after conventional cardiac surgery are postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), stroke and delirium. Minimal invasive cardiac procedures have recently been introduced into practice. Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (Endo-CABG) is a minimal invasive cardiac procedure based on the conventional CABG procedure. Neurocognitive outcome after minimal invasive cardiac surgery, including Endo-CABG, has never been studied. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to examine neurocognitive outcome after Endo-CABG. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will perform a prospective observational cohort study including 150 patients. Patients are categorised into three groups: (1) patients undergoing Endo-CABG, (2) patients undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention and (3) a healthy volunteer group. All patients in the Endo-CABG group will be treated following a uniform, standardised protocol. To assess neurocognitive outcome after surgery, a battery of six neurocognitive tests will be administered at baseline and at 3-month follow-up. In the Endo-CABG group, a neurological examination will be performed at baseline and postoperatively and delirium will be scored at the intensive care unit. Quality of life (QOL), anxiety and depression will be assessed at baseline and at 3-month follow-up. Satisfaction with Endo-CABG will be assessed at 3-month follow-up. Primary endpoints are the incidence of POCD, stroke and delirium after Endo-CABG. Secondary endpoints are QOL after Endo-CABG, patient satisfaction with Endo-CABG and the incidence of anxiety and depression after Endo-CABG. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The neurological outcome after minimal invasive coronary artery surgery study has received approval of the Jessa Hospital ethics board. It is estimated that the trial will be executed from December 2016 to January 2018, including enrolment and follow-up. Analysis of data, followed by publication of the results, is expected in 2018. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02979782.

Indexed as

CognitionAdultAgedCognitive DysfunctionCoronary Artery BypassCoronary Artery Bypass, Off-PumpCoronary VesselsDeliriumEndoscopyFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPercutaneous Coronary Interventioncoronary heart diseasedeliriumminimal invasive coronary artery surgeryneurological outcomepostoperative cognitive dysfunctionstroke

Identifiers

PMID28988183
PMCPMC5640084
OpenAlexW2761917238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.