Trial reportBMJ open2017
Effectiveness of the HuCare Quality Improvement Strategy on health-related quality of life in patients with cancer: study protocol of a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial (HuCare2 study).
Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03008993 (Trial Clinico Controllato e Randomizzato, Con Disegno a Cluster Stepped-wedge, Per Valutare Una Strategia Volta ad Ottimizzare Gli Outcomes Psicosociali in Pazienti Affetti da Cancro), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Trial Clinico Controllato e Randomizzato, Con Disegno a Cluster Stepped-wedge, Per Valutare Una Strategia Volta ad Ottimizzare Gli Outcomes Psicosociali in Pazienti Affetti da Cancro
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effectiveness of clinical guideline implementation strategies in oncology-a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- PDCA cycle and safety culture in nursing safety management of Day Ward chemotherapy.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Trial
- Effectiveness of a Psychosocial Care Quality Improvement Strategy to Address Quality of Life in Patients With Cancer: The HuCare2 Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial.JAMA network open · 2021Trial
- Evaluation of Parents and Child Satisfaction Toward Primary Molar Restoration with Preformed Metal Crowns and Its Impact on Child Bullying.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Efficacy and results of virtual nursing intervention for cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2024Review
- Review
- Screening for Distress in Oncological Patients: The Revised Version of the Psychological Distress Inventory (PDI-R).Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- The Stepped-Wedge Trial Design: Paving the Way for Cancer Care Delivery Research.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOur group previously demonstrated the feasibility of the HuCare Quality Improvement Strategy (HQIS), aimed at integrating into practice six psychosocial interventions recommended by international guidelines. This trial will assess whether the introduction of the strategy in oncology wards improves patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Multicentre, incomplete stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial, conducted in three clusters of five centres each, in three equally spaced time epochs. The study also includes an initial epoch when none of the centres are exposed to the intervention, and a final epoch when all centres will have implemented the strategy. The intervention is applied at a cluster level, and assessed at an individual level with cross-sectional model. A total of 720 patients who received a cancer diagnosis in the previous 2 months and about to start medical treatment will be enrolled. The primary aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of the HQIS versus standard care in terms of improvement of at least one of two domains (emotional and social functions) of HRQoL using the EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 items) questionnaire, at baseline and at 3 months. This outcome was chosen because patients with cancer generally exhibit low HRQoL, particularly at certain stages of care, and because it allows to assess the strategy's impact as perceived by patients themselves. The HQIS comprises three phases: (1) clinician training-to improve communication-relational skills and instruct on the project; (2) centre support-four on-site visits by experts of the project team, aimed to boost motivation, help with context analysis and identification of solutions; (3) implementation of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) recommendations at the centre. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics committee review approval has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of Parma. Results will be disseminated at conferences, and in peer-reviewed and professional journals intended for policymakers and managers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03008993; Pre-results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.