Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28988170›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

Effectiveness of the HuCare Quality Improvement Strategy on health-related quality of life in patients with cancer: study protocol of a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial (HuCare2 study).

Caterina Caminiti, Elisa Iezzi, Rodolfo Passalacqua

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03008993 (Trial Clinico Controllato e Randomizzato, Con Disegno a Cluster Stepped-wedge, Per Valutare Una Strategia Volta ad Ottimizzare Gli Outcomes Psicosociali in Pazienti Affetti da Cancro), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03008993 nacompletednot on this map

Trial Clinico Controllato e Randomizzato, Con Disegno a Cluster Stepped-wedge, Per Valutare Una Strategia Volta ad Ottimizzare Gli Outcomes Psicosociali in Pazienti Affetti da Cancro

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituti Ospitalieri di CremonaRan2016 to 2018Enrolled762ConditionsCancerArmsHQIS implementation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Caterina CaminitiResearch and Innovation Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Elisa IezziResearch and Innovation Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Rodolfo PassalacquaDivision of Medical Oncology, Hospital of Cremona, Cremona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOur group previously demonstrated the feasibility of the HuCare Quality Improvement Strategy (HQIS), aimed at integrating into practice six psychosocial interventions recommended by international guidelines. This trial will assess whether the introduction of the strategy in oncology wards improves patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Multicentre, incomplete stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial, conducted in three clusters of five centres each, in three equally spaced time epochs. The study also includes an initial epoch when none of the centres are exposed to the intervention, and a final epoch when all centres will have implemented the strategy. The intervention is applied at a cluster level, and assessed at an individual level with cross-sectional model. A total of 720 patients who received a cancer diagnosis in the previous 2 months and about to start medical treatment will be enrolled. The primary aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of the HQIS versus standard care in terms of improvement of at least one of two domains (emotional and social functions) of HRQoL using the EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 items) questionnaire, at baseline and at 3 months. This outcome was chosen because patients with cancer generally exhibit low HRQoL, particularly at certain stages of care, and because it allows to assess the strategy's impact as perceived by patients themselves. The HQIS comprises three phases: (1) clinician training-to improve communication-relational skills and instruct on the project; (2) centre support-four on-site visits by experts of the project team, aimed to boost motivation, help with context analysis and identification of solutions; (3) implementation of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) recommendations at the centre. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics committee review approval has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of Parma. Results will be disseminated at conferences, and in peer-reviewed and professional journals intended for policymakers and managers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03008993; Pre-results.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPsychosocial Support SystemsQuality ImprovementQuality of LifeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationResearch Designcancer patientscommunication skillshealth-related quality of lifeimplementation strategypsychosocial interventionsstepped-wedge design

Identifiers

PMID28988170
PMCPMC5640062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.