Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28988160›Full record

Trial reportArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2018

Effect of MRI on preterm infants and their families: a randomised trial with nested diagnostic and economic evaluation.

A David Edwards, Maggie E Redshaw, Nigel Kennea, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Nuria Gonzales-Cinca, Phumza Nongena, Moegamad Ederies, Shona Falconer, Andrew Chew, Omar Omar and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01049594 (Evaluation of MR Imaging to Predict Neurodevelopmental Impairment in Preterm Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
20.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01049594 unknown statusnot on this map

Evaluation of MR Imaging to Predict Neurodevelopmental Impairment in Preterm Infants

TypeobservationalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2010 to 2015Enrolled625ConditionsCerebral Palsy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Associations between neonatal brain structure and neurodevelopmental outcomes following very preterm birth.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

A David EdwardsCentre for the Developing Brain, School of Bioengineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London and Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4801-7066
Maggie E RedshawNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nigel KenneaNeonatal Unit, St George's Hospital, London, UK.
Oliver Rivero-AriasNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2233-6544
Nuria Gonzales-CincaCentre for the Developing Brain, School of Bioengineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London and Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, UK.
Phumza NongenaDivision of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Moegamad EderiesDivision of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Shona FalconerCentre for the Developing Brain, School of Bioengineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London and Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, UK.
Andrew ChewCentre for the Developing Brain, School of Bioengineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London and Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, UK.
Omar OmarNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Pollyanna HardyNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Merryl Elizabeth HarveyFaculty of Health, School of Midwifery, Nursing and Social Work, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK.
Oya EddamaNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Naomi HaywardDivision of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Julia WurieCentre for the Developing Brain, School of Bioengineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London and Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, UK.
Denis AzzopardiCentre for the Developing Brain, School of Bioengineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London and Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, UK.
Mary A RutherfordCentre for the Developing Brain, School of Bioengineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London and Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, UK.
Serena CounsellCentre for the Developing Brain, School of Bioengineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London and Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, UK.
ePrime Investigators
King's College London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBImperial College London · GBBirmingham City University · GBSt George's Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0707-10154Medical Research Council MC_U120088465Medical Research Council MR/K006355/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe tested the hypothesis that routine MRI would improve the care and well-being of preterm infants and their families.

designParallel-group randomised trial (1.1 allocation; intention-to-treat) with nested diagnostic and cost evaluations (EudraCT 2009-011602-42).

settingParticipants from 14 London hospitals, imaged at a single centre. PATIENTS: 511 infants born before 33 weeks gestation underwent both MRI and ultrasound around term. 255 were randomly allocated (siblings together) to receive only MRI results and 255 only ultrasound from a paediatrician unaware of unallocated results; one withdrew before allocation.

main outcome measuresMaternal anxiety, measured by the State-Trait Anxiety inventory (STAI) assessed in 206/214 mothers receiving MRI and 217/220 receiving ultrasound. Secondary outcomes included: prediction of neurodevelopment, health-related costs and quality of life.

resultsAfter MRI, STAI fell from 36.81 (95% CI 35.18 to 38.44) to 32.77 (95% CI 31.54 to 34.01), 31.87 (95% CI 30.63 to 33.12) and 31.82 (95% CI 30.65 to 33.00) at 14 days, 12 and 20 months, respectively. STAI fell less after ultrasound: from 37.59 (95% CI 36.00 to 39.18) to 33.97 (95% CI 32.78 to 35.17), 33.43 (95% CI 32.22 to 34.63) and 33.63 (95% CI 32.49 to 34.77), p=0.02. There were no differences in health-related quality of life. MRI predicted moderate or severe functional motor impairment at 20 months slightly better than ultrasound (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (CI) 0.74; 0.66 to 0.83 vs 0.64; 0.56 to 0.72, p=0.01) but cost £315 (CI £295-£336) more per infant.

conclusionsMRI increased costs and provided only modest benefits.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01049594 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01049594. EudraCT: EudraCT: 2009-011602-42 (https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/).

Indexed as

AnxietyBrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingUltrasonographyAdultChild DevelopmentFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleMaternal BehaviorNeurologic ExaminationPostnatal CareTreatment OutcomeMRIneurodevelopmentpretermSTAIultrasound

Identifiers

PMID28988160
PMCPMC5750369
OpenAlexW2762887703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.