Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28988011›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2017

Coordinated morphogenesis of neurons and glia.

Elizabeth R Lamkin, Maxwell G Heiman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Glia Development and Function in the NematodeCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Pathways that affect anterior morphogenesis inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Astrocyte-Neuron Signaling in Synaptogenesis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A high-content imaging approach to profileDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth R LamkinDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School and Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston MA 02115, United States.
Maxwell G HeimanDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School and Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston MA 02115, United States. Electronic address: heiman@genetics.med.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · US

Funding

ZP Domain Proteins and Epithelial IntegrityR01GM108754 · NIGMS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI HEIMAN, MAXWELL · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
Formation of a neuron-glia contact at single-cell resolution in C. elegansF31NS103371 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI CEBUL, ELIZABETH ROSE · 2017 to 2018
$64k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108754NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS103371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glia adopt remarkable shapes that are tightly coordinated with the morphologies of their neuronal partners. To achieve these precise shapes, glia and neurons exhibit coordinated morphological changes on the time scale of minutes and on size scales ranging from nanometers to hundreds of microns. Here, we review recent studies that reveal the highly dynamic, localized morphological changes of mammalian neuron-glia contacts. We then explore the power of Drosophila and C. elegans models to study coordinated changes at defined neuron-glia contacts, highlighting the use of innovative genetic and imaging tools to uncover the molecular mechanisms responsible for coordinated morphogenesis of neurons and glia.

Indexed as

MorphogenesisAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansDrosophilaNeurogliaNeurons

Identifiers

PMID28988011
PMCPMC5953193
OpenAlexW2767204170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.