Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28987906›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2019

Visually evoked responses from the blind field of hemianopic patients.

Javier Sanchez-Lopez, Caterina A Pedersini, Francesco Di Russo, Nicolò Cardobi, Cristina Fonte, Valentina Varalta, Massimo Prior, Nicola Smania, Silvia Savazzi, Carlo A Marzi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Javier Sanchez-LopezDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, Italy. Electronic address: javier.sanchezlopez@univr.it.
Caterina A PedersiniDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, Italy.
Francesco Di RussoDepartment. of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy; IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Nicolò CardobiDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, Italy.
Cristina FonteNeuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, Italy.
Valentina VaraltaNeuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, Italy.
Massimo PriorASL 8 Asolo, Treviso, Italy.
Nicola SmaniaNeuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, Italy.
Silvia SavazziDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, Italy; Perception and Awareness (PandA) Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, Italy; National Institute of Neuroscience, Verona, Italy.
Carlo A MarziDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, Italy; National Institute of Neuroscience, Verona, Italy.
University of Verona · ITAzienda ULSS 9 TREVISO · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

European Research Council 339939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemianopia is a visual field defect characterized by decreased vision or blindness in the contralesional visual field of both eyes. The presence of well documented above-chance unconscious behavioural responses to visual stimuli presented to the blind hemifield (blindsight) has stimulated a great deal of research on the neural basis of this important phenomenon. The present study is concerned with electrophysiological responses from the blind field. Since previous studies found that transient Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPs) are not entirely suitable for this purpose here we propose to use Steady-State VEPs (SSVEPs). A positive result would have important implications for the understanding of the neural bases of conscious vision. We carried out a passive SSVEP stimulation with healthy participants and hemianopic patients. Stimuli consisted of four black-and-white sinusoidal Gabor gratings presented one in each visual field quadrant and flickering one at a time at a 12Hz rate. To assess response reliability a Signal-to-Noise Ratio analysis was conducted together with further analyses in time and frequency domains to make comparisons between groups (healthy participants and patients), side of brain lesion (left and right) and visual fields (sighted and blind). The important overall result was that stimulus presentation to the blind hemifield yielded highly reliable responses with time and frequency features broadly similar to those found for cortical extrastriate areas in healthy controls. Moreover, in the intact hemifield of hemianopics and in healthy controls there was evidence of a role of prefrontal structures in perceptual awareness. Finally, the presence of different patterns of brain reorganization depended upon the side of lesion.

Indexed as

Visual FieldsAdultAwarenessBlindnessElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleFunctional LateralityHemianopsiaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationSignal-To-Noise RatioVisual CortexVisual Field TestsExtrastriate visual areasHemianopiaPerceptual awarenessSteady-state visual evoked potentials

Identifiers

PMID28987906
PMCPMC5845440
OpenAlexW2762801662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.