ReviewCancer letters2018
Favorable biodistribution, specific targeting and conditional endosomal escape of RNA nanoparticles in cancer therapy.
Review in Cancer letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developing Potent Therapeutics for Liver Cancer Chemoresistance via an RNA Nanotech and Series-Circuit-Christmas-Bulb Mechanism Targeting ABC Transporters.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Analysis of the role of RNA regulatory networks in cancer treatment: Mechanisms, applications and future prospects (Review).Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Plant-derived exosome-like nanovesicles: a novel therapeutic perspective for skin diseases.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- mRNA vaccines and SiRNAs targeting cancer immunotherapy: challenges and opportunities.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Synergistic RNA particles for spontaneous and specific cancer targeting but low toxicity due to motility and deformation.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Article
- Review
- Multifunctional Nanomaterials: Recent Advancements in Cancer Therapeutics and Vaccines.Indian journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- Recent Advances and Clinical Approach to Cancer Treatment with Nanotechnology Derived Biomolecule.Pharmaceutical nanotechnology · 2025Review
- Synergistic integration of extracellular vesicles and metal-organic frameworks: unlocking new opportunities in disease diagnosis and therapy.Theranostics · 2025Review
- Cracking the Code: Enhancing Molecular Tools for Progress in Nanobiotechnology.ACS applied bio materials · 2024Review
- RNA four-way junction (4WJ) for spontaneous cancer-targeting, effective tumor-regression, metastasis suppression, fast renal excretion and undetectable toxicity.Biomaterials · 2024Article
- NucleoCraft: The Art of Stimuli-Responsive Precision in DNA and RNA Bioengineering.BME frontiers · 2024Review
- Effects of Dendrimer-microRNA Nanoformulations against Glioblastoma Stem Cells.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- RNAi-Based Therapeutics and Novel RNA Bioengineering Technologies.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2023Review
- RNA origami: design, simulation and application.RNA biology · 2023Review
- Effects of Cationic Dendrimers and Their Complexes with microRNAs on Immunocompetent Cells.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Review
- MgPharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Translocated Legionella pneumophila small RNAs mimic eukaryotic microRNAs targeting the host immune response.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Novel Perspectives towards RNA-Based Nano-Theranostic Approaches for Cancer Management.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The past decades have witnessed the successful transition of several nanotechnology platforms into the clinical trials. However, specific delivery of therapeutics to tumors is hindered by several barriers including cancer recognition and tissue penetration, particle heterogeneity and aggregation, and unfavorable pharmacokinetic profiles such as fast clearance and organ accumulation. With the advent of RNA nanotechnology, a series of RNA nanoparticles have been successfully constructed to overcome many of the aforementioned challenges for in vivo cancer targeting with favorable biodistribution profiles. Compared to other nanodelivery platforms, the physiochemical properties of RNA nanoparticles can be tuned with relative ease for investigating the in vivo behavior of nanoparticles upon systemic injection. The size, shape, and surface chemistry, especially hydrophobic modifications, exert significant impacts on the in vivo fate of RNA nanoparticles. Rationally designed RNA nanoparticles with defined stoichiometry and high homogeneity have been demonstrated to specifically target tumor cells while avoiding accumulation in healthy vital organs after systemic injection. RNA nanoparticles were proven to deliver therapeutics such as siRNA and anti-miRNA to block tumor growth in several animal models. Although the release of anti-miRNA from the RNA nanoparticles has achieved high efficiency of tumor regression in multiple animal models, the efficiency of endosomal escape for siRNA delivery needs further improvement. This review focuses on the advances and perspectives of this promising RNA nanotechnology platform for cancer targeting and therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.