Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28987015›Full record

ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2018

Center practice drives variation in choice of US kidney transplant induction therapy: a retrospective analysis of contemporary practice.

Vikas R Dharnidharka, Abhijit S Naik, David A Axelrod, Mark A Schnitzler, Zidong Zhang, Sunjae Bae, Dorry L Segev, Daniel C Brennan, Tarek Alhamad, Rosemary Ouseph and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Effectiveness of T cell-mediated rejection therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Kidney Transplant Outcomes With Non-Depleting Antibody Induction Therapy in Human Leucocyte Antigen Sensitised Recipients.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Article
  7. T-cell receptor sequencing reveals selected donor-reactive CD8American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Use and Outcomes of Induction Therapy in Well-Matched Kidney Transplant Recipients.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Adequate tacrolimus exposure modulates the impact of HLA class II molecular mismatch: a validation study in an American cohort.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Sensitization in transplantation: Assessment of risk (STAR) 2019 Working Group Meeting Report.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Molecular Mismatch-the Renaissance of HLA in Kidney Transplantation.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Vikas R DharnidharkaDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Nephrology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8000-1385
Abhijit S NaikDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
David A AxelrodDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Lahey Clinic, Burlington, MA, USA.
Mark A SchnitzlerCenter for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Zidong ZhangCenter for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Sunjae BaeCenter for Transplantation, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Dorry L SegevCenter for Transplantation, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Daniel C BrennanCenter for Transplantation, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Tarek AlhamadTransplant Nephrology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Rosemary OusephCenter for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Ngan N LamDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Mustafa NazzalCenter for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Henry RandallCenter for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Bertram L KasiskeDepartment of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Mara McAdams-DemarcoCenter for Transplantation, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Krista L LentineCenter for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9423-4849

Funding

Choosing Immune Suppression in Renal Transplantation by Efficacy and MorbidityR01DK102981 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DHARNIDHARKA, VIKAS R. · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK102981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess factors that influence the choice of induction regimen in contemporary kidney transplantation, we examined center-identified, national transplant registry data for 166 776 US recipients (2005-2014). Bilevel hierarchical models were constructed, wherein use of each regimen was compared pairwise with use of interleukin-2 receptor blocking antibodies (IL2rAb). Overall, 82% of patients received induction, including thymoglobulin (TMG, 46%), IL2rAb (22%), alemtuzumab (ALEM, 13%), and other agents (1%). However, proportions of patients receiving induction varied widely across centers (0-100%). Recipients of living donor transplants and self-pay patients were less likely to receive induction treatment. Clinical factors associated with use of TMG or ALEM (vs. IL2rAb) included age, black race, sensitization, retransplant status, nonstandard deceased donor, and delayed graft function. However, these characteristics explained only 10-33% of observed variation. Based on intraclass correlation analysis, "center effect" explained most of the variation in TMG (58%), ALEM (66%), other (51%), and no induction (58%) use. Median odds ratios generated from case-factor adjusted models (7.66-11.19) also supported large differences in the likelihood of induction choices between centers. The wide variation in induction therapy choice across US transplant centers is not dominantly explained by differences in patient or donor characteristics; rather, it reflects center choice and practice.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCohort StudiesFemaleGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHumansKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedPrecision MedicineRegistriesRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedimmunosuppressioninductionkidney transplantationpractice patterns

Identifiers

PMID28987015
PMCPMC5862637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.