Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28986857›Full record

ArticleMolecular diagnosis & therapy2017

Increased Sensitivity of Diagnostic Mutation Detection by Re-analysis Incorporating Local Reassembly of Sequence Reads.

Christopher M Watson, Nick Camm, Laura A Crinnion, Samuel Clokie, Rachel L Robinson, Julian Adlard, Ruth Charlton, Alexander F Markham, Ian M Carr, David T Bonthron

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher M WatsonYorkshire Regional Genetics Service, St. James's University Hospital, 6.2 Clinical Sciences Building, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom. c.m.watson@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2371-1844
Nick CammYorkshire Regional Genetics Service, St. James's University Hospital, 6.2 Clinical Sciences Building, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
Laura A CrinnionYorkshire Regional Genetics Service, St. James's University Hospital, 6.2 Clinical Sciences Building, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
Samuel ClokieWest Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TG, United Kingdom.
Rachel L RobinsonYorkshire Regional Genetics Service, St. James's University Hospital, 6.2 Clinical Sciences Building, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
Julian AdlardYorkshire Regional Genetics Service, St. James's University Hospital, 6.2 Clinical Sciences Building, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
Ruth CharltonYorkshire Regional Genetics Service, St. James's University Hospital, 6.2 Clinical Sciences Building, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
Alexander F MarkhamMRC Single Cell Functional Genomics Centre, St. James's University Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
Ian M CarrMRC Single Cell Functional Genomics Centre, St. James's University Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
David T BonthronYorkshire Regional Genetics Service, St. James's University Hospital, 6.2 Clinical Sciences Building, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
University of Leeds · GBSt James's University Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L01629X/1Medical Research Council MR/M009084/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnostic genetic testing programmes based on next-generation DNA sequencing have resulted in the accrual of large datasets of targeted raw sequence data. Most diagnostic laboratories process these data through an automated variant-calling pipeline. Validation of the chosen analytical methods typically depends on confirming the detection of known sequence variants. Despite improvements in short-read alignment methods, current pipelines are known to be comparatively poor at detecting large insertion/deletion mutations.

methodsWe performed clinical validation of a local reassembly tool, ABRA (assembly-based realigner), through retrospective reanalysis of a cohort of more than 2000 hereditary cancer cases.

resultsABRA enabled detection of a 96-bp deletion, 4-bp insertion mutation in PMS2 that had been initially identified using a comparative read-depth approach. We applied an updated pipeline incorporating ABRA to the entire cohort of 2000 cases and identified one previously undetected pathogenic variant, a 23-bp duplication in PTEN. We demonstrate the effect of read length on the ability to detect insertion/deletion variants by comparing HiSeq2500 (2 × 101-bp) and NextSeq500 (2 × 151-bp) sequence data for a range of variants and thereby show that the limitations of shorter read lengths can be mitigated using appropriate informatics tools.

conclusionsThis work highlights the need for ongoing development of diagnostic pipelines to maximize test sensitivity. We also draw attention to the large differences in computational infrastructure required to perform day-to-day versus large-scale reprocessing tasks.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p18DNA Mutational AnalysisGenetic TestingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2NeoplasmsPTEN PhosphohydrolaseSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNACDKN2A protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p18Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2PMS2 protein, humanPTEN PhosphohydrolasePTEN protein, human

Identifiers

PMID28986857
OpenAlexW2763649298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.